Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bugfix/profile missing #143

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Jan 15, 2024
Merged

Bugfix/profile missing #143

merged 10 commits into from
Jan 15, 2024

Conversation

amitschendel
Copy link
Collaborator

@amitschendel amitschendel commented Jan 14, 2024

Type

Bug fix


Description

This PR primarily focuses on bug fixes related to the handling of capabilities in application profiles. The key changes include:

  • Removal of an unnecessary else statement in the GetApplicationProfileAccess function in pkg/approfilecache/cache.go.
  • Changing the return type of the GetCapabilities function across multiple files from ([]collector.CapabilitiesCalls, error) to (*[]collector.CapabilitiesCalls, error). This change affects the SingleApplicationProfileAccess interface, the MockAppProfileAccess struct in pkg/engine/engine_test.go and pkg/engine/rule/mock.go.
  • Dereferencing the appProfileCapabilitiesList variable in the ProcessEvent function of pkg/engine/rule/r0004_unexpected_capability_used.go to iterate over its elements.
  • Configuration changes in chart/kubecop/files/freshclam.conf where ScriptedUpdates was set to no and Checks was set to 0.

Changes walkthrough

Relevant files                                                                                                                                 
Bug fix
cache.go                                                                                                       
    pkg/approfilecache/cache.go

    The else statement was removed from the
    GetApplicationProfileAccess function. The return type of
    GetCapabilities function was changed from
    ([]collector.CapabilitiesCalls, error) to
    (*[]collector.CapabilitiesCalls, error).

+4/-5
types.go                                                                                                       
    pkg/approfilecache/types.go

    The return type of GetCapabilities function in the
    SingleApplicationProfileAccess interface was changed from
    ([]collector.CapabilitiesCalls, error) to
    (*[]collector.CapabilitiesCalls, error).

+1/-1
engine_test.go                                                                                           
    pkg/engine/engine_test.go

    The return type of GetCapabilities function in the
    MockAppProfileAccess struct was changed from
    ([]collector.CapabilitiesCalls, error) to
    (*[]collector.CapabilitiesCalls, error).

+2/-2
mock.go                                                                                                         
    pkg/engine/rule/mock.go

    The return type of GetCapabilities function in the
    MockAppProfileAccess struct was changed from
    ([]collector.CapabilitiesCalls, error) to
    (*[]collector.CapabilitiesCalls, error).

+2/-2
r0004_unexpected_capability_used.go                                                 
    pkg/engine/rule/r0004_unexpected_capability_used.go

    The appProfileCapabilitiesList variable in the
    ProcessEvent function was dereferenced to iterate over its
    elements.

+1/-1
Configuration changes
freshclam.conf                                                                                           
    chart/kubecop/files/freshclam.conf

    The ScriptedUpdates setting was changed from yes to no
    and the Checks setting was changed from 12 to 0.

+2/-2

✨ Usage guide:

Overview:
The describe tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a description for the PR - title, type, summary, walkthrough and labels. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on a PR.

When commenting, to edit configurations related to the describe tool (pr_description section), use the following template:

/describe --pr_description.some_config1=... --pr_description.some_config2=...

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_description]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...
Enabling\disabling automation
  • When you first install the app, the default mode for the describe tool is:
pr_commands = ["/describe --pr_description.add_original_user_description=true" 
                         "--pr_description.keep_original_user_title=true", ...]

meaning the describe tool will run automatically on every PR, will keep the original title, and will add the original user description above the generated description.

  • Markers are an alternative way to control the generated description, to give maximal control to the user. If you set:
pr_commands = ["/describe --pr_description.use_description_markers=true", ...]

the tool will replace every marker of the form pr_agent:marker_name in the PR description with the relevant content, where marker_name is one of the following:

  • type: the PR type.
  • summary: the PR summary.
  • walkthrough: the PR walkthrough.

Note that when markers are enabled, if the original PR description does not contain any markers, the tool will not alter the description at all.

Custom labels

The default labels of the describe tool are quite generic: [Bug fix, Tests, Enhancement, Documentation, Other].

If you specify custom labels in the repo's labels page or via configuration file, you can get tailored labels for your use cases.
Examples for custom labels:

  • Main topic:performance - pr_agent:The main topic of this PR is performance
  • New endpoint - pr_agent:A new endpoint was added in this PR
  • SQL query - pr_agent:A new SQL query was added in this PR
  • Dockerfile changes - pr_agent:The PR contains changes in the Dockerfile
  • ...

The list above is eclectic, and aims to give an idea of different possibilities. Define custom labels that are relevant for your repo and use cases.
Note that Labels are not mutually exclusive, so you can add multiple label categories.
Make sure to provide proper title, and a detailed and well-phrased description for each label, so the tool will know when to suggest it.

Utilizing extra instructions

The describe tool can be configured with extra instructions, to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project.

Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Notice that the general structure of the description is fixed, and cannot be changed. Extra instructions can change the content or style of each sub-section of the PR description.

Examples for extra instructions:

[pr_description] 
extra_instructions="""
- The PR title should be in the format: '<PR type>: <title>'
- The title should be short and concise (up to 10 words)
- ...
"""

Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

More PR-Agent commands

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:

  • /review: Request a review of your Pull Request.
  • /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
  • /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback.
  • /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR.
  • /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.
  • /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR.
  • /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents.
  • /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component.

See the tools guide for more details.
To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

See the describe usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

Copy link

PR Description updated to latest commit (2f292f0)

Copy link

PR Analysis

  • 🎯 Main theme: Bug fix for handling capabilities in application profiles
  • 📝 PR summary: This PR addresses a bug in the handling of capabilities in application profiles. It includes the removal of an unnecessary else statement, changing the return type of the GetCapabilities function, dereferencing a variable for iteration, and configuration changes in freshclam.conf.
  • 📌 Type of PR: Bug fix
  • 🧪 Relevant tests added: No
  • ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]: 3, because the PR involves changes in multiple files and functions, and requires understanding of the application profiles and capabilities handling.
  • 🔒 Security concerns: No security concerns found

PR Feedback

💡 General suggestions: The PR seems to be well-structured and focused on addressing the specific bug. However, it would be beneficial to include tests that validate these changes and prevent future regressions.

🤖 Code feedback:
relevant filepkg/approfilecache/cache.go
suggestion      

Consider adding error handling for the case when containerProfile.Name does not match containerName. This could help in identifying issues when the expected container profile is not found. [important]

relevant line}, nil

relevant filepkg/engine/rule/r0004_unexpected_capability_used.go
suggestion      

It would be more efficient to break the loop once the found variable is set to true. This would avoid unnecessary iterations. [medium]

relevant linefound = true

relevant filechart/kubecop/files/freshclam.conf
suggestion      

Ensure that the changes in the configuration file, specifically setting ScriptedUpdates to no and Checks to 0, do not affect other parts of the system or compromise security. [important]

relevant lineScriptedUpdates no


✨ Usage guide:

Overview:
The review tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a PR review. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR.
When commenting, to edit configurations related to the review tool (pr_reviewer section), use the following template:

/review --pr_reviewer.some_config1=... --pr_reviewer.some_config2=...

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_reviewer]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...
Utilizing extra instructions

The review tool can be configured with extra instructions, which can be used to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project.

Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify the relevant sub-tool, and the relevant aspects of the PR that you want to emphasize.

Examples for extra instructions:

[pr_reviewer] # /review #
extra_instructions="""
In the code feedback section, emphasize the following:
- Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases?
- Is the code logic clear and easy to understand?
- Is the code logic efficient?
...
"""

Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

How to enable\disable automation
  • When you first install PR-Agent app, the default mode for the review tool is:
pr_commands = ["/review", ...]

meaning the review tool will run automatically on every PR, with the default configuration.
Edit this field to enable/disable the tool, or to change the used configurations

About the 'Code feedback' section

The review tool provides several type of feedbacks, one of them is code suggestions.
If you are interested only in the code suggestions, it is recommended to use the improve feature instead, since it dedicated only to code suggestions, and usually gives better results.
Use the review tool if you want to get a more comprehensive feedback, which includes code suggestions as well.

Auto-labels

The review tool can auto-generate two specific types of labels for a PR:

  • a possible security issue label, that detects possible security issues (enable_review_labels_security flag)
  • a Review effort [1-5]: x label, where x is the estimated effort to review the PR (enable_review_labels_effort flag)
Extra sub-tools

The review tool provides a collection of possible feedbacks about a PR.
It is recommended to review the possible options, and choose the ones relevant for your use case.
Some of the feature that are disabled by default are quite useful, and should be considered for enabling. For example:
require_score_review, require_soc2_review, enable_review_labels_effort, and more.

More PR-Agent commands

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:

  • /review: Request a review of your Pull Request.
  • /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
  • /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback.
  • /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR.
  • /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.
  • /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR.
  • /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents.
  • /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component.

See the tools guide for more details.
To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

See the review usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

@amitschendel amitschendel added the requires-system-test trigger to run system test on PRs label Jan 14, 2024
Signed-off-by: Amit Schendel <[email protected]>
Copy link

✨ Artifacts are available here.

Signed-off-by: Amit Schendel <[email protected]>
Copy link

✨ Artifacts are available here.

Copy link

✨ Artifacts are available here.

Signed-off-by: Amit Schendel <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Amit Schendel <[email protected]>
@amitschendel amitschendel merged commit 779bbc7 into main Jan 15, 2024
6 of 7 checks passed
@amitschendel amitschendel deleted the bugfix/profile-missing branch January 15, 2024 14:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Bug fix requires-system-test trigger to run system test on PRs
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants