Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: use UUID for Packages IDs from pom.xml files. #7879

Open
wants to merge 10 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

DmitriyLewen
Copy link
Contributor

@DmitriyLewen DmitriyLewen commented Nov 6, 2024

Description

There are cases when report contains Packages with same GAV (GroupID, ArtifactID, version).
But these are different packages (see #7824 (comment)).

To avoid confusing and build dependency graph correctly, we need to use UUID for each Package from pom.xml files.

This solution also fixes problem with relationships in SBOM formats for this case (see #7824 (comment))

PR blocker - #7889

Related issues

Related PR

Checklist

  • I've read the guidelines for contributing to this repository.
  • I've followed the conventions in the PR title.
  • I've added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works.
  • I've updated the documentation with the relevant information (if needed).
  • I've added usage information (if the PR introduces new options)
  • I've included a "before" and "after" example to the description (if the PR is a user interface change).

@DmitriyLewen DmitriyLewen self-assigned this Nov 6, 2024
@DmitriyLewen DmitriyLewen marked this pull request as ready for review December 2, 2024 09:42
@DmitriyLewen DmitriyLewen changed the title refactor: use UUID for Packages from pom.xml files. refactor: use UUID for Packages IDs from pom.xml files. Dec 3, 2024
@@ -148,7 +148,8 @@ func (p *Parser) parseRoot(root artifact, uniqModules map[string]struct{}) ([]ft
if _, ok := uniqModules[art.String()]; ok {
continue
}
uniqModules[art.String()] = struct{}{}
art.ID = uuid.New()
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I want the output reports to be as reproducible as possible. I'm considering another approach, but I have not yet come up with...

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you mean using something like a hash instead of UUID?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's one of the options. Regardless of the method, I want the same value to be output as much as possible when scanning the same object.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

bug(sbom): Duplicate SBOM packages for multi-module pom.xml files
2 participants