-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 79
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add ConcurrentFungibleAssetSupply and ConcurrentFungibleAssetBalance #338
Conversation
@@ -112,7 +124,7 @@ impl FungibleAssetBalance { | |||
asset_type: asset_type.clone(), | |||
is_primary, | |||
is_frozen: inner.frozen, | |||
amount: inner.balance.clone(), | |||
amount: concurrent_balance.unwrap_or_else(|| inner.balance.clone()), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
like it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think that this'll work? Were you able to get it to show concurrent balance? Not making sense to me tbh.
let concurrent_balance: Option<BigDecimal> = | ||
ConcurrentFungibleAssetBalance::from_write_resource( | ||
write_resource, | ||
txn_version, | ||
) | ||
.ok() | ||
.and_then(|balance| balance.map(|b| Some(b.balance.value.clone()))) | ||
.unwrap_or(None); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
wait how are you able to get the balance given this write resource is actually FungibleAssetStore? I think that you might need to pre-process and store it in object_metadatas
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fixed it by pre-processing and storing in object_metadatas.
pub current: AggregatorU128, | ||
} | ||
|
||
impl ConcurrentFungibleAssetSupply { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This doesn't seem to be used anywhere?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the observation. I am now pre-processing and storing the ConcurrentFungibleAssetSupply in object_metadatas. I modified FungibleAssetMetadataModel to store the ConcurrentFungibleAssetSupply in supply_v2 and maximum_v2.
Can you also add a test plan? Usually for testing, we run the processor on example transactions and check that the data stored in postgres is correct. |
b9245ca
to
60f48d6
Compare
Any progress? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
looks good to me. I'm curious how it's tested though.
rust/processor/src/utils/util.rs
Outdated
@@ -450,6 +450,15 @@ pub struct AggregatorSnapshotU64 { | |||
pub value: BigDecimal, | |||
} | |||
|
|||
// TODO: How is this different from AgggregatorU64? | |||
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone)] | |||
pub struct AggregatorU128 { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
if it's not diff from U64 can you just rename and reuse? These names don't matter. E.g. you can name it AggregatorBigint or something.
bcaa820
to
5ba621c
Compare
5ba621c
to
8b217d4
Compare
8b217d4
to
d742c8b
Compare
This PR adds the indexer support for the AIP 70 (aptos-labs/aptos-core#11183).
AIP 70 adds ConcurrentSupply and ConcurrentBalance for fungible assets. Unlike the regular supply and balance, the newly added ConcurrentSupply and ConcurrentBalance use aggregators for improved parallelizability.
This PR indexes ConcurrentSupply and ConcurrentBalance in the indexer. The indexing is done in a way that Supply and ConcurrentSupply, Balance and ConcurrentBalance are treated identically when storing into the database so that the indexer client wouldn't notice a difference whether the aggregators are being used or not.
Backfill