Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added conformsToProtocol feature for typhoon matcher #455

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 1, 2015
Merged

Added conformsToProtocol feature for typhoon matcher #455

merged 2 commits into from
Dec 1, 2015

Conversation

Emailrus
Copy link
Contributor

Related issue #454

@@ -24,11 +24,13 @@ @interface TyphoonOptionMatch : NSObject
@property (nonatomic, strong) id value;
@property (nonatomic) Class memberClass;
@property (nonatomic) Class kindClass;
@property (nonatomic) Protocol *proto;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's use the full name here (and in every other place too) - protocol (or, if it's reserved, something like conformProtocol.

@etolstoy
Copy link
Contributor

@Emailrus Thanks for contributing! I've just reviewed your PR - it looks awesome! 🎉

Just a few style objections from me - and we can merge it.

@alexgarbarev
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @Emailrus for contribution and @igrekde for review. I've reviews and totally agreed with @igrekde :-) Let's merge right after minor spelling fixes

@Emailrus
Copy link
Contributor Author

Done and thanks for the lib

@etolstoy
Copy link
Contributor

etolstoy commented Dec 1, 2015

Thanks!

etolstoy added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 1, 2015
Added conformsToProtocol feature for typhoon matcher
@etolstoy etolstoy merged commit 48c8f9b into appsquickly:master Dec 1, 2015
@Emailrus Emailrus deleted the feature/matcherEnhancement branch December 2, 2015 08:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants