Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: refactor the github actions has-secrets logic #26790

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

mistercrunch
Copy link
Member

While working on #26772, I realized that the has-secret logic was broken for unclear reasons. Now after doing this fix, I looked and realized that there's similar logic across about a dozen other gh actions, and thought it'd be a good thing to refactor/fix this with a reusable action.

Now many of these workflows are set to trigger on push-on-master only meaning it's less of an issue since a false positive on has-secret dpesn't matter in that context since there's always a secret.

I still thought I should refactor this to something we can trust and build upon.

The solution introduces this new simple reusable action.

One minor note is in cases where we need multiple secrets, as in say DOCKERHUB_TOKEN and DOCKERHUB_USER, we simply look at one and assume that's clear-enough of an indicator.

While working on apache#26772, I
realized that the has-secret logic was broken for unclear reasons. Now
after doing this fix, I looked and realized that there's similar logic
across about a dozen other gh actions, and thought it'd be a good thing
to refactor/fix this with a reusable action.

Now many of these workflows are set to trigger on push-on-master only
meaning it's less of an issue since a false positive on has-secret
dpesn't matter in that context since there's always a secret.

I still thought I should refactor this to something we can trust and
build upon.

The solution introduces this new simple reusable action.

One minor note is in cases where we need multiple secrets, as in say
DOCKERHUB_TOKEN and DOCKERHUB_USER, we simply look at one and assume
that's clear-enough of an indicator.
@mistercrunch
Copy link
Member Author

closing/reopening from a branch on the main fork to test further

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant