Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "[SPARK-49909][SQL] Fix the pretty name of some expressions" #48530

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

panbingkun
Copy link
Contributor

@panbingkun panbingkun commented Oct 18, 2024

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

The pr aims to revert #48385.
This reverts commit 52538f0.

Why are the changes needed?

When upgrading spark from an old version to the latest version, some end-users may rely on the original schema (although it may not be correct), which can make the upgrade very difficult. so, let's first restore it to its original state.

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No.

How was this patch tested?

Pass GA

Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?

No.

@panbingkun panbingkun marked this pull request as ready for review October 18, 2024 02:27
Copy link
Member

@dongjoon-hyun dongjoon-hyun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1, LGTM. Thank you for reverting before Apache Spark 3.4.4, @panbingkun .

@dongjoon-hyun
Copy link
Member

cc @MaxGekk

@panbingkun
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks all!

Copy link
Member

@MaxGekk MaxGekk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why are the changes needed?
Only revert.

It would be nice if you provide some reasons for reverting the bug fix.

@panbingkun
Copy link
Contributor Author

It would be nice if you provide some reasons for reverting the bug fix.

Okay, let me add something for it.

@panbingkun
Copy link
Contributor Author

Why are the changes needed?
Only revert.

It would be nice if you provide some reasons for reverting the bug fix.

Done.

@MaxGekk
Copy link
Member

MaxGekk commented Oct 18, 2024

+1, LGTM. Merging to master.
Thank you, @panbingkun and @HyukjinKwon @zhengruifeng @dongjoon-hyun for review.

@MaxGekk MaxGekk closed this in b0414b1 Oct 18, 2024
himadripal pushed a commit to himadripal/spark that referenced this pull request Oct 19, 2024
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The pr aims to revert apache#48385.
This reverts commit 52538f0.

### Why are the changes needed?
When upgrading spark from `an old version` to `the latest version`, some end-users may rely on the `original schema` (`although it may not be correct`), which can make the `upgrade` very difficult. so, let's first restore it to its original state.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.

### How was this patch tested?
Pass GA

### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
No.

Closes apache#48530 from panbingkun/SPARK-49909_revert.

Authored-by: panbingkun <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Max Gekk <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants