-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Revert "[SPARK-35253][SPARK-35398][SQL][BUILD] Bump up the janino version to v3.1.4" #33302
Conversation
cc @maropu |
Kubernetes integration test starting |
Could you resolve the conflicts, @cloud-fan ? |
Kubernetes integration test status success |
Kubernetes integration test starting |
Test build #140928 has finished for PR 33302 at commit
|
Kubernetes integration test status success |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since SPARK-35398 has a different JIRA ID from SPARK-35253, I inevitably added it to the PR title.
Test build #140931 has finished for PR 33302 at commit
|
late lgtm, thanks, @cloud-fan |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Merged to master and branch-3.2. |
…sion to v3.1.4" ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR reverts #32455 and its followup #32536 , because the new janino version has a bug that is not fixed yet: janino-compiler/janino#148 ### Why are the changes needed? avoid regressions ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? no ### How was this patch tested? existing tests Closes #33302 from cloud-fan/revert. Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit ae6199a) Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <[email protected]>
@maropu It looks like janino is prepare to release 3.1.5 |
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR reverts #32455 and its followup #32536 , because the new janino version has a bug that is not fixed yet: janino-compiler/janino#148
Why are the changes needed?
avoid regressions
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
no
How was this patch tested?
existing tests