Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[FEATURE] Support concurrent write to multiple local disks for one partition #436

Closed
3 tasks done
zuston opened this issue Dec 16, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #2253 or #2266
Closed
3 tasks done

[FEATURE] Support concurrent write to multiple local disks for one partition #436

zuston opened this issue Dec 16, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #2253 or #2266
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@zuston
Copy link
Member

zuston commented Dec 16, 2022

Code of Conduct

Search before asking

  • I have searched in the issues and found no similar issues.

Describe the feature

Support concurrent write to multiple local disks for one partition to speed up local writing, like #396.

This ticket should be based on #435

Motivation

No response

Describe the solution

No response

Additional context

No response

Are you willing to submit PR?

  • Yes I am willing to submit a PR!
@zuston zuston added the help wanted Extra attention is needed label Dec 16, 2022
@zuston zuston linked a pull request Dec 23, 2022 that will close this issue
feat: support multiple disk selection for one partition when using local storage #435
Closed
@maobaolong maobaolong mentioned this issue Nov 16, 2024
Merged
@maobaolong maobaolong mentioned this issue Nov 27, 2024
Merged
maobaolong added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 1, 2024
@maobaolong
[#436][FOLLOWUP] docs: Add documents for localStorageManagerClass and…
db611f4 
… MultiPartLocalStorageManager (#2266)

### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Add config localStorageManagerClass description to introduce the default value and MultiPartLocalStorageManager.

### Why are the changes needed?

Add missing docs.

Fix: #436

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

No need.
jerqi pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 4, 2024
@maobaolong @jerqi
[#436] feat(client,server): Introduce multi-part LocalStorageManager (#…
d653897 
…2253)

### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

- Introduce a factory to create specific LocalStorageManager by config.
- Introduce multiply disk LocalStorageManager.

### Why are the changes needed?

Fix: #436 

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

- Existing UTs and new added UT
- Tested on our pressure test cluster.
  - new client -> old server ✓
  - new client -> new server ✓
  - old client -> new server ❌, so we have to upgraded client first, than upgrade the servers
jerqi pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 4, 2024
@maobaolong @jerqi
[#436][FOLLOWUP] docs: Add documents for localStorageManagerClass and…
c4da702 
… MultiPartLocalStorageManager (#2266)

### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Add config localStorageManagerClass description to introduce the default value and MultiPartLocalStorageManager.

### Why are the changes needed?

Add missing docs.

Fix: #436

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

No need.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
1 participant
@zuston