Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

HDFS-16375. The FBR lease ID should be exposed to the log #3769

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 16, 2021

Conversation

tomscut
Copy link
Contributor

@tomscut tomscut commented Dec 8, 2021

JIRA: HDFS-16375.

Our Hadoop version is 3.1.0. We encountered HDFS-12914 and HDFS-14314 in the production environment.

When locating the problem, the fullBrLeaseId was not exposed in the log, which caused some difficulties. We should add it to the log.

@hadoop-yetus
Copy link

💔 -1 overall

Vote Subsystem Runtime Logfile Comment
+0 🆗 reexec 0m 43s Docker mode activated.
_ Prechecks _
+1 💚 dupname 0m 0s No case conflicting files found.
+0 🆗 codespell 0m 0s codespell was not available.
+1 💚 @author 0m 0s The patch does not contain any @author tags.
-1 ❌ test4tests 0m 0s The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch.
_ trunk Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 32m 36s trunk passed
+1 💚 compile 1m 29s trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04
+1 💚 compile 1m 18s trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
+1 💚 checkstyle 1m 1s trunk passed
+1 💚 mvnsite 1m 26s trunk passed
+1 💚 javadoc 1m 2s trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04
+1 💚 javadoc 1m 32s trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
+1 💚 spotbugs 3m 15s trunk passed
+1 💚 shadedclient 22m 25s branch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 1m 17s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 1m 18s the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04
+1 💚 javac 1m 18s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 1m 11s the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
+1 💚 javac 1m 11s the patch passed
+1 💚 blanks 0m 0s The patch has no blanks issues.
+1 💚 checkstyle 0m 52s the patch passed
+1 💚 mvnsite 1m 16s the patch passed
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 50s the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04
+1 💚 javadoc 1m 25s the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
+1 💚 spotbugs 3m 12s the patch passed
+1 💚 shadedclient 21m 48s patch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
_ Other Tests _
+1 💚 unit 225m 19s hadoop-hdfs in the patch passed.
+1 💚 asflicense 0m 46s The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
324m 0s
Subsystem Report/Notes
Docker ClientAPI=1.41 ServerAPI=1.41 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-3769/1/artifact/out/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR #3769
Optional Tests dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite unit shadedclient spotbugs checkstyle codespell
uname Linux 0674d2da0984 4.15.0-58-generic #64-Ubuntu SMP Tue Aug 6 11:12:41 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool maven
Personality dev-support/bin/hadoop.sh
git revision trunk / e6023ce
Default Java Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
Multi-JDK versions /usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64:Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04 /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64:Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
Test Results https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-3769/1/testReport/
Max. process+thread count 3479 (vs. ulimit of 5500)
modules C: hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs U: hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs
Console output https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-3769/1/console
versions git=2.25.1 maven=3.6.3 spotbugs=4.2.2
Powered by Apache Yetus 0.14.0-SNAPSHOT https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

@tomscut
Copy link
Contributor Author

tomscut commented Dec 15, 2021

Hi @tasanuma @Hexiaoqiao @ferhui , PTAL. Thanks.

@tomscut
Copy link
Contributor Author

tomscut commented Dec 15, 2021

Thanks @tasanuma for your comments. I'm in favor of your suggestion and I will fix it.

@hadoop-yetus
Copy link

💔 -1 overall

Vote Subsystem Runtime Logfile Comment
+0 🆗 reexec 0m 59s Docker mode activated.
_ Prechecks _
+1 💚 dupname 0m 0s No case conflicting files found.
+0 🆗 codespell 0m 0s codespell was not available.
+1 💚 @author 0m 0s The patch does not contain any @author tags.
-1 ❌ test4tests 0m 0s The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch.
_ trunk Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 35m 45s trunk passed
+1 💚 compile 1m 39s trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04
+1 💚 compile 1m 21s trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
+1 💚 checkstyle 0m 59s trunk passed
+1 💚 mvnsite 1m 34s trunk passed
+1 💚 javadoc 1m 6s trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04
+1 💚 javadoc 1m 28s trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
+1 💚 spotbugs 3m 30s trunk passed
+1 💚 shadedclient 26m 14s branch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 1m 38s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 1m 45s the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04
+1 💚 javac 1m 45s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 1m 33s the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
+1 💚 javac 1m 33s the patch passed
+1 💚 blanks 0m 0s The patch has no blanks issues.
+1 💚 checkstyle 1m 5s the patch passed
+1 💚 mvnsite 1m 37s the patch passed
+1 💚 javadoc 1m 5s the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04
+1 💚 javadoc 1m 44s the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
+1 💚 spotbugs 4m 10s the patch passed
+1 💚 shadedclient 30m 14s patch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
_ Other Tests _
-1 ❌ unit 377m 16s /patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs.txt hadoop-hdfs in the patch passed.
+1 💚 asflicense 0m 58s The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
494m 15s
Reason Tests
Failed junit tests hadoop.hdfs.web.TestWebHdfsFileSystemContract
Subsystem Report/Notes
Docker ClientAPI=1.41 ServerAPI=1.41 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-3769/2/artifact/out/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR #3769
Optional Tests dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite unit shadedclient spotbugs checkstyle codespell
uname Linux a6d0cf57cc27 4.15.0-142-generic #146-Ubuntu SMP Tue Apr 13 01:11:19 UTC 2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool maven
Personality dev-support/bin/hadoop.sh
git revision trunk / 10b8494
Default Java Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
Multi-JDK versions /usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64:Ubuntu-11.0.11+9-Ubuntu-0ubuntu2.20.04 /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64:Private Build-1.8.0_292-8u292-b10-0ubuntu1~20.04-b10
Test Results https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-3769/2/testReport/
Max. process+thread count 2024 (vs. ulimit of 5500)
modules C: hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs U: hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs
Console output https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-3769/2/console
versions git=2.25.1 maven=3.6.3 spotbugs=4.2.2
Powered by Apache Yetus 0.14.0-SNAPSHOT https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

@tasanuma tasanuma merged commit 10cdde5 into apache:trunk Dec 16, 2021
@tasanuma
Copy link
Member

Merged it. Thanks for your contribution, @tomscut!

tasanuma pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 16, 2021
ashutoshcipher pushed a commit to ashutoshcipher/hadoop that referenced this pull request Dec 22, 2021
sunchao pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 4, 2022
HarshitGupta11 pushed a commit to HarshitGupta11/hadoop that referenced this pull request Nov 28, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants