-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hadoop-16899. Update HdfsDesign.md to reduce ambiguity. #1871
Conversation
Considering the statement segmented in 3 parts by the commas: 1. the first part talks about "one thirds of replicas"; 2. the second part talks about "two thirds of replicas" 3. the third part talking about "the other third" is leading to ambiguity when one thirds and two thirds have already accounted for the whole. Possible solution is to either get rid of the third part or rephrase entire sentence to capture the overall essence of the sentence. Please suggest.
Closing because the procedure to raise a JIRA before pull request wasn't followed, will raise again with right steps. |
Re-opened on creating JIRA. |
🎊 +1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
Thank you for your contribution. The sentence seems still ambiguous to me
-> Two replicas are on one rack, and the remaining replica is on one of the other racks.
The following sentence is not directly related to your PR, however, it can be fixed at the same time.
If a block is placed in three unique racks, the probability of rack-local read will increase and the network bandwidth will be reduced when reading the data. Therefore I think 'does' should be changed to 'does not'. |
Hi @aajisaka , thank you for your feedback. I agree with you, talk about fractions made me think about multiple blocks of file. I will replace the sentence with the one you suggested, it will make it clear. I am happy to include the 2nd recommended update as well. I will update and raise the PR again. |
Thanks.
You can add commits in the same branch and let the PR get updated automatically :) |
Should we also update the following:
And for the previous discussion I'm considering the statement as follows:
|
Updated 3 sentences to correct some and improve clarity in others.
🎊 +1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
(cherry picked from commit bbd704b)
Proposed change is in 2nd last sentence of the affected paragraph.
Considering the statement segmented in 3 parts by the commas:
Possible solution is to either get rid of the third part or rephrase entire sentence to capture the overall essence of the sentence.
Please suggest.
NOTICE
Please create an issue in ASF JIRA before opening a pull request,
and you need to set the title of the pull request which starts with
the corresponding JIRA issue number. (e.g. HADOOP-XXXXX. Fix a typo in YYY.)
For more details, please see https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/HADOOP/How+To+Contribute