[Survey] Is it necessary to continue to maintain zkclient in dubbo project?

[cvictory]

There are two zookeeper implements that are curator and zkclient.

ZkClient github: https://github.com/sgroschupf/zkclient/tree/master/src/main/java/org/I0Itec/zkclient .
And the repository is not updated frequently.

So if you think we should continue to keep zkClient in dubbo project , please reply -1 and give us reason.

[+1] : remove.
[-1] ：Keep. And give us some reason or what you encounter.

[ralf0131]

+1 to remove zkclient

[chickenlj]

I think we can rely on curator directly as it has emerged as the facto standard of zk client tools.
Maintaining the zk client SPI requires much effort from us but with only less gain.

[mercyblitz]

+1 Agreed to delete

[CrazyHZM]

+1 remove

[kezhenxu94]

+1 to remove

[cvictory]

I will remove it in dubbo-2.7.1 at this week. If you have different opinions, please let me know as soon as possible. kezhenxu94 <[email protected]> 于2019年2月28日周四 下午10:31写道：

…

+1 to remove — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#3569 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AD5mbO8CG61O0G8HEVJNIdB5AettgA7lks5vR-hYgaJpZM4bRtPF> .

-- Best Regard! cvitory

[cvictory]

I think we can rely on curator directly as it has emerged as the facto standard of zk client tools.
Maintaining the zk client SPI requires much effort from us but with only less gain.

I think we will remove zkclient firstly, but not to depend curator directly. This change is too big.
Maybe we should disscuss it in a new issue at community.