-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Dont call multiunzip when no stats #9220
Changes from 1 commit
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ pub async fn get_statistics_with_limit( | |
all_files: impl Stream<Item = Result<(PartitionedFile, Statistics)>>, | ||
file_schema: SchemaRef, | ||
limit: Option<usize>, | ||
collect_stats: bool, | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Given the function is called 'get_statistics There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yes good catch, will do. |
||
) -> Result<(Vec<PartitionedFile>, Statistics)> { | ||
let mut result_files = vec![]; | ||
// These statistics can be calculated as long as at least one file provides | ||
|
@@ -78,6 +79,9 @@ pub async fn get_statistics_with_limit( | |
while let Some(current) = all_files.next().await { | ||
let (file, file_stats) = current?; | ||
result_files.push(file); | ||
if !collect_stats { | ||
continue; | ||
} | ||
|
||
// We accumulate the number of rows, total byte size and null | ||
// counts across all the files in question. If any file does not | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was disconnect between benchmark name (physical plan) and the function(logical plan), so I corrected this