Fix group by aliased expression in LogicalPLanBuilder::aggregate

datafusion/core/src/dataframe/mod.rs

@@ -1825,8 +1825,8 @@ mod tests {
         let df_results = collect(physical_plan, ctx.task_ctx()).await?;
 
         #[rustfmt::skip]
-        assert_batches_sorted_eq!(
-            [    "+----+",
+        assert_batches_sorted_eq!([
+                "+----+",
                 "| id |",
                 "+----+",
                 "| 1  |",
@@ -1837,6 +1837,38 @@ mod tests {
         Ok(())
     }
 
+    #[tokio::test]
+    async fn test_aggregate_alias() -> Result<()> {
+        let df = test_table().await?;
+
+        let df = df
+            // GROUP BY `c2 + 1`
+            .aggregate(vec![col("c2") + lit(1)], vec![])?
+            // SELECT `c2 + 1` as c2
+            .select(vec![(col("c2") + lit(1)).alias("c2")])?
+            // GROUP BY c2 as "c2" (alias in expr is not supported by SQL)
+            .aggregate(vec![col("c2").alias("c2")], vec![])?;
+
+        let df_results = df.collect().await?;
+
+        #[rustfmt::skip]
+        assert_batches_sorted_eq!([
+                "+----+",
+                "| c2 |",
+                "+----+",
+                "| 2  |",
+                "| 3  |",
+                "| 4  |",
+                "| 5  |",
+                "| 6  |",
+                "+----+",
+            ],
+            &df_results
+        );
+
+        Ok(())
+    }
+
     #[tokio::test]
     async fn test_distinct() -> Result<()> {
         let t = test_table().await?;

datafusion/expr/src/logical_plan/builder.rs

@@ -904,27 +904,11 @@ impl LogicalPlanBuilder {
         group_expr: impl IntoIterator<Item = impl Into<Expr>>,
         aggr_expr: impl IntoIterator<Item = impl Into<Expr>>,
     ) -> Result<Self> {
-        let mut group_expr = normalize_cols(group_expr, &self.plan)?;
+        let group_expr = normalize_cols(group_expr, &self.plan)?;
         let aggr_expr = normalize_cols(aggr_expr, &self.plan)?;
 
-        // Rewrite groupby exprs according to functional dependencies
-        let group_by_expr_names = group_expr
-            .iter()
-            .map(|group_by_expr| group_by_expr.display_name())
-            .collect::<Result<Vec<_>>>()?;
-        let schema = self.plan.schema();
-        if let Some(target_indices) =
-            get_target_functional_dependencies(schema, &group_by_expr_names)
-        {
-            for idx in target_indices {
-                let field = schema.field(idx);
-                let expr =
-                    Expr::Column(Column::new(field.qualifier().cloned(), field.name()));
-                if !group_expr.contains(&expr) {
-                    group_expr.push(expr);
-                }
-            }
-        }
+        let group_expr =
+            add_group_by_exprs_from_dependencies(group_expr, self.plan.schema())?;
         Aggregate::try_new(Arc::new(self.plan), group_expr, aggr_expr)
             .map(LogicalPlan::Aggregate)
             .map(Self::from)
@@ -1189,6 +1173,42 @@ pub fn build_join_schema(
     schema.with_functional_dependencies(func_dependencies)
 }
 
+/// Add additional "synthetic" group by expressions based on functional
+/// dependencies.
+///
+/// For example, if we are grouping on `[c1]`, and we know from
+/// functional dependencies that column `c1` determines `c2`, this function
+/// adds `c2` to the group by list.
+///
+/// This allows MySQL style selects like
+/// `SELECT col FROM t WHERE pk = 5` if col is unique
+fn add_group_by_exprs_from_dependencies(
+    mut group_expr: Vec<Expr>,
+    schema: &DFSchemaRef,
+) -> Result<Vec<Expr>> {
+    // Names of the fields produced by the GROUP BY exprs for example, `GROUP BY
+    // c1 + 1` produces an output field named `"c1 + 1"`
+    let mut group_by_field_names = group_expr
+        .iter()
+        .map(|e| e.display_name())
+        .collect::<Result<Vec<_>>>()?;
+
+    if let Some(target_indices) =
+        get_target_functional_dependencies(schema, &group_by_field_names)
+    {
+        for idx in target_indices {
+            let field = schema.field(idx);
+            let expr =
+                Expr::Column(Column::new(field.qualifier().cloned(), field.name()));
+            let expr_name = expr.display_name()?;
+            if !group_by_field_names.contains(&expr_name) {
+                group_by_field_names.push(expr_name);
+                group_expr.push(expr);
+            }
+        }
+    }
+    Ok(group_expr)
+}
 /// Errors if one or more expressions have equal names.
 pub(crate) fn validate_unique_names<'a>(
     node_name: &str,