-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: correct CountWildcardRule and move analyzer into a new directory. #5671
Conversation
Should this rule internally call |
Oh, this Rule didn't handle it ...... I will correct it. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me -- thank you @jackwener
.explain(false, false)? | ||
.collect() | ||
.await?; | ||
|
||
// add `.select(vec![count(Expr::Wildcard)])?` to make sure we can analyze all node instead of just top node. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
thanks @jackwener for correcting it, I learned a lot from your code. |
Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #.
Rationale for this change
related PR: #5627
What changes are included in this PR?
Are these changes tested?
Are there any user-facing changes?