Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update snmalloc-rs requirement from 0.2 to 0.3 #2663

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 31, 2022

Conversation

dependabot[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github May 31, 2022

Updates the requirements on snmalloc-rs to permit the latest version.

Changelog

Sourced from snmalloc-rs's changelog.

0.3.0

  • Release to follow upstream 0.6.0
  • upstream Major redesign of the code to improve performance and enable a mode that provides strong checks against corruption.

0.3.0-beta.1

  • Beta release to support snmalloc 2

0.2.28

  • Deprecation of cache-friendly
  • Use exposed alloc_zeroed from snmalloc
  • upstream changes of remote communication, corruption detection and compilation flag detection.

0.2.27

  • Reduction of libc dependency
  • upstream Windows 7 and windows 8 compatibility added
  • upstream Option to use C++20 standards if available
  • upstream Preparations of cherification (heavy refactors of the structure)
  • upstream Cold routine annotations

0.2.26

  • upstream Building adjustment
  • option of cc crate as build feature, only c compiler needed, no cmake required
  • Addition of dynamic local TLS option

0.2.25

  • upstream Apple M1 support
  • upstream Building adjust
  • non-allocation tracking functions

0.2.24

  • upstream update to use a more efficient power of 2 check
  • fix msvc support w/ crt-static

0.2.23

  • upstream fix external pagemap usage

0.2.22

  • upstream avoid amplification when routing
  • upstream remotely store sizeclass
  • upstream limit flat pagemap size
  • upstream limit medium slab header
  • upstream solaris support fix

... (truncated)

Commits

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

Updates the requirements on [snmalloc-rs](https://github.com/SchrodingerZhu/snmalloc-rs) to permit the latest version.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/SchrodingerZhu/snmalloc-rs/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/SchrodingerZhu/snmalloc-rs/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](https://github.com/SchrodingerZhu/snmalloc-rs/commits)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: snmalloc-rs
  dependency-type: direct:production
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
@tustvold tustvold merged commit 89d0143 into master May 31, 2022
@dependabot dependabot bot deleted the dependabot/cargo/master/snmalloc-rs-0.3 branch May 31, 2022 11:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants