-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: Support faster multi-column grouping ( GroupColumn
) for Date/Time/Timestamp
types
#13457
Conversation
Giving weird results, trying to fix. Is someone else able to run this on their computer and see what they get. |
@alamb Was this the sort of implementation you were looking for? (will add tests) |
Yes, exactly this -- thank you.
I will run it on a GCP VM and report back. Given most of those queries don't group on date/time/timestamp columns this seems somewhat suspicious |
And
My conclusion is that the variability for the very fast queries (10s - 100s of ms) is significant. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
GroupColumn
for Date/Time/Timestamp
GroupColumn
) for Date/Time/Timestamp
types
Thanks again @jonathanc-n and @jayzhan211 |
I think the last remaining type is Decimal -- I will file one more ticket |
Filed #13505 for the last of it |
Epic -- thank again for finishing this work up @jonathanc-n |
…or `Date/Time/Timestamp` types (apache#13457)" This reverts commit ecc04d4.
Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #13263.
Rationale for this change
What changes are included in this PR?
Add group column for Date/Time/Timestamp
Are these changes tested?
Are there any user-facing changes?