Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement comparisons on nested data types such that distinct/except would work #11117
Implement comparisons on nested data types such that distinct/except would work #11117
Changes from all commits
b028bbe
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is likely quite slow as it will be doing dynamic dispatch per row.
However, slow is better than not working at first.
Could you please: update the name of the function to reflect it isn't just for
null
anymore? Perhaps we could rename it toeq_dyn
or something more genericThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think other than the potential rename the PR is ready to go -- however I also think we could do the rename as a follow on PR
Note @jayzhan211 added similiar code to handle nested comparisons in
eq_datum
in #11091 -- I wonder if we would consolidate those implementations somehowThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We could do the comparison with datum function, I move it to physical-common in #11091
It will be a nice alternative for
equal_rows_arr
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
in #11149