Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Automatically refresh Performance Metrics Graphs using Looker #34097

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 3, 2025

Conversation

Amar3tto
Copy link
Collaborator


Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:

  • Mention the appropriate issue in your description (for example: addresses #123), if applicable. This will automatically add a link to the pull request in the issue. If you would like the issue to automatically close on merging the pull request, comment fixes #<ISSUE NUMBER> instead.
  • Update CHANGES.md with noteworthy changes.
  • If this contribution is large, please file an Apache Individual Contributor License Agreement.

See the Contributor Guide for more tips on how to make review process smoother.

To check the build health, please visit https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.test-infra/BUILD_STATUS.md

GitHub Actions Tests Status (on master branch)

Build python source distribution and wheels
Python tests
Java tests
Go tests

See CI.md for more information about GitHub Actions CI or the workflows README to see a list of phrases to trigger workflows.

Copy link
Contributor

@damccorm damccorm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, this mostly LGTM - just had some minor feedback. Once that is addressed and we have the secrets in the repo, we can merge and try it out

def main():
for folder, look_ids in LOOKS_TO_DOWNLOAD:
for look_id in look_ids:
if look_id:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we wrap this if statement in a try/catch so that if a single look fails, we still update the rest (and then fail the job)?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

# poll the render task until it completes
elapsed = 0.0
delay = 20
while True:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we set a max number of retries (maybe 20?) and then fail if we exceed that?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

Copy link
Contributor

@damccorm damccorm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! I'll merge once the secrets are added

@damccorm
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @Amar3tto the secrets have been added, could you please move your PR out of draft?

@Amar3tto Amar3tto marked this pull request as ready for review March 2, 2025 05:31
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 2, 2025

Assigning reviewers. If you would like to opt out of this review, comment assign to next reviewer:

R: @damccorm for label build.

Available commands:

  • stop reviewer notifications - opt out of the automated review tooling
  • remind me after tests pass - tag the comment author after tests pass
  • waiting on author - shift the attention set back to the author (any comment or push by the author will return the attention set to the reviewers)

The PR bot will only process comments in the main thread (not review comments).

Copy link
Contributor

@damccorm damccorm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@damccorm damccorm merged commit fb061f2 into apache:master Mar 3, 2025
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants