-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Don't use __getstate__ for pickling for objects with a custom __reduce__. #33157
Conversation
1fcd45e
to
f40f301
Compare
Checks are failing. Will not request review until checks are succeeding. If you'd like to override that behavior, comment |
elif hasattr(value, "__getstate__"): | ||
elif (hasattr(value, "__getstate__") and | ||
# https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/33020 | ||
type(value).__reduce__ == object.__reduce): | ||
if not hasattr(value, "__setstate__"): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
are we sure this works?
class MyClass:
def __init__(self, value):
self.value = value
def __reduce__(self):
return (self.__class__, (self.value,))
tt = MyClass(1)
print(object.__reduce__ == type(tt).__reduce__)
This also returns False. I might misunderstand how this works.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We want this to return False
as MyClass has a custom __reduce__
method (meaning relying on __set/getstate__
is not safe).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see what you mean now. Thanks. Better fix than my hack.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well, thanks goes to you for hunting down the root cause; it was not obvious at all what was going on here :). I'll merge once tests pass.
Assigning reviewers. If you would like to opt out of this review, comment R: @liferoad for label python. Available commands:
The PR bot will only process comments in the main thread (not review comments). |
This fixes #33137
Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:
addresses #123
), if applicable. This will automatically add a link to the pull request in the issue. If you would like the issue to automatically close on merging the pull request, commentfixes #<ISSUE NUMBER>
instead.CHANGES.md
with noteworthy changes.See the Contributor Guide for more tips on how to make review process smoother.
To check the build health, please visit https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.test-infra/BUILD_STATUS.md
GitHub Actions Tests Status (on master branch)
See CI.md for more information about GitHub Actions CI or the workflows README to see a list of phrases to trigger workflows.