Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve validation error message #17719

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 19, 2022

Conversation

damccorm
Copy link
Contributor

Right now, it isn't clear from this error which DoFn is causing this error/where it is. This will dump the whole DoFn's name and file path.


Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:

  • Choose reviewer(s) and mention them in a comment (R: @username).
  • Format the pull request title like [BEAM-XXX] Fixes bug in ApproximateQuantiles, where you replace BEAM-XXX with the appropriate JIRA issue, if applicable. This will automatically link the pull request to the issue.
  • Update CHANGES.md with noteworthy changes.
  • If this contribution is large, please file an Apache Individual Contributor License Agreement.

See the Contributor Guide for more tips on how to make review process smoother.

To check the build health, please visit https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.test-infra/BUILD_STATUS.md

GitHub Actions Tests Status (on master branch)

Build python source distribution and wheels
Python tests
Java tests

See CI.md for more information about GitHub Actions CI.

@asf-ci
Copy link

asf-ci commented May 19, 2022

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

2 similar comments
@asf-ci
Copy link

asf-ci commented May 19, 2022

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@asf-ci
Copy link

asf-ci commented May 19, 2022

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@github-actions github-actions bot added the go label May 19, 2022
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 19, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #17719 (fab8c5d) into master (da4fcad) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #17719   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   73.99%   73.99%           
=======================================
  Files         695      695           
  Lines       91798    91798           
=======================================
  Hits        67926    67926           
  Misses      22624    22624           
  Partials     1248     1248           
Flag Coverage Δ
go 50.41% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
sdks/go/pkg/beam/core/graph/fn.go 76.82% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update da4fcad...fab8c5d. Read the comment docs.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Assigning reviewers. If you would like to opt out of this review, comment assign to next reviewer:

R: @riteshghorse for label go.

Available commands:

  • stop reviewer notifications - opt out of the automated review tooling
  • remind me after tests pass - tag the comment author after tests pass
  • waiting on author - shift the attention set back to the author (any comment or push by the author will return the attention set to the reviewers)

The PR bot will only process comments in the main thread (not review comments).

@riteshghorse
Copy link
Contributor

R: @lostluck

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Stopping reviewer notifications for this pull request: review requested by someone other than the bot, ceding control

Copy link
Contributor

@lostluck lostluck left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM Thanks!

@lostluck lostluck merged commit f3041e0 into apache:master May 19, 2022
@damccorm damccorm deleted the users/damccorm/errorMessage branch May 19, 2022 22:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants