fix(ipc): reencode list offsets bug #5808
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Can we get a test please |
The example adds to the issue: #5809 |
|
From the "Archery test With other arrows" results, it appears that java arrow was unable to decode the Rust String ListArray after fixing the bug. 🤔 |
|
Your comment appeared to imply Java can't handle this currently in which case we shouldn't do this just yet. Additionally can we get the test added to the test suite, otherwise there is nothing to prevent regressions |
|
Possibly related to #5895 |
|
Marking as a draft as this PR appears not to be waiting on feedback. Please mark it as ready for review when it is ready for another look |
|
Closing as this PR has been inactive for a while |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #5809
Rationale for this change
What changes are included in this PR?
Are there any user-facing changes?