Return BooleanBuffer from BooleanBufferBuilder #4140
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
github-actions
bot
added
arrow
tustvold
commented
Apr 26, 2023
| #[inline] | ||
| pub fn finish(&mut self) -> Buffer { | ||
| pub fn finish(&mut self) -> BooleanBuffer { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I felt it was better to just break the API, than leaving the API in a somewhat incoherent state, where a type called BooleanBufferBuilder doesn't actually build BooleanBuffer
viirya
approved these changes
Apr 26, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which issue does this PR close?
Relates to #3879
Rationale for this change
This improves the ergonomics of creating packed
BooleanBufferand relatedNullBufferto feed into the new constructorsWhat changes are included in this PR?
Are there any user-facing changes?