Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Relax path validation (#2355) #2356

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 8, 2022
Merged

Conversation

tustvold
Copy link
Contributor

@tustvold tustvold commented Aug 7, 2022

Which issue does this PR close?

Closes #2355
Closes #2349

Rationale for this change

See tickets

What changes are included in this PR?

This relaxes the validation in PathPart::parse to be less conservative about what constitutes a safe path. In particular it should accept any "safe" path, even if it would not generate such a path itself.

Are there any user-facing changes?

No

@github-actions github-actions bot added the object-store Object Store Interface label Aug 7, 2022
@@ -1247,4 +1247,23 @@ mod tests {
0
);
}

#[tokio::test]
async fn filesystem_filename_with_percent() {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is @jccampagne 's test case from #2351

@tustvold tustvold force-pushed the relax-path-validation branch from 4f5629d to 2911464 Compare August 7, 2022 17:25
let decoded: Cow<'a, [u8]> = percent_decode(segment.as_bytes()).into();
let part = PathPart::from(decoded.as_ref());
if segment != part.as_ref() {
if segment == "." || segment == ".." {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could some percent_validate be upstreamed to percent_encoding?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It would certainly be helpful if AsciiSet had a public interface to check a byte

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Filed a ticket servo/rust-url#784

Copy link
Contributor

@crepererum crepererum left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Upstreaming would be nice, otherwise this looks good.

@ursabot
Copy link

ursabot commented Aug 8, 2022

Benchmark runs are scheduled for baseline = ce2bd1e and contender = 0c828a9. 0c828a9 is a master commit associated with this PR. Results will be available as each benchmark for each run completes.
Conbench compare runs links:
[Skipped ⚠️ Benchmarking of arrow-rs-commits is not supported on ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2] ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2
[Skipped ⚠️ Benchmarking of arrow-rs-commits is not supported on test-mac-arm] test-mac-arm
[Skipped ⚠️ Benchmarking of arrow-rs-commits is not supported on ursa-i9-9960x] ursa-i9-9960x
[Skipped ⚠️ Benchmarking of arrow-rs-commits is not supported on ursa-thinkcentre-m75q] ursa-thinkcentre-m75q
Buildkite builds:
Supported benchmarks:
ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2: Supported benchmark langs: Python, R. Runs only benchmarks with cloud = True
test-mac-arm: Supported benchmark langs: C++, Python, R
ursa-i9-9960x: Supported benchmark langs: Python, R, JavaScript
ursa-thinkcentre-m75q: Supported benchmark langs: C++, Java

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
object-store Object Store Interface
Projects
None yet
3 participants