-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 99
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(python/adbc_driver_manager): export handles and ingest data through python Arrow PyCapsule interface #1346
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
df501e1
WIP
lidavidm a5878b7
small clean-up + fix dunder name + some tests
jorisvandenbossche 07da02c
expand test
jorisvandenbossche e0fdba2
ingest data supporting the Arrow PyCapsule protocol
jorisvandenbossche 3856a6c
lint
jorisvandenbossche 40ea168
undo version bump
jorisvandenbossche 30d4324
remove ArrowArrayHandle.__arrow_c_array__
jorisvandenbossche 6f51825
accept objects that implement the protocol in the lowlevel api
jorisvandenbossche acf591f
clean-up unused array capsule helper
jorisvandenbossche 6564ab1
only call dunder if not a handle class (avoid moving for the handle c…
jorisvandenbossche File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We are "moving" the schema here, while in nanoarrow I opted for a hard copy for the schema (using nanoarrow's
ArrowSchemaDeepCopy
).But I think the only advantage of a hard copy is that this means you can consume it multiple times? (or in the case of nanoarrow-python, that the nanoarrow Schema object is still valid and inspectable after it has been converted to eg a pyarrow.Schema)
For ADBC, I think the use case will be much more "receive handle and convert it directly once", given that the Handle object itself isn't useful at all (in contrast to nanoarrow.Schema), so moving here is probably fine?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think moving makes sense here.