Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Restrict looker-sdk version 24.18.0 and microsoft-kiota-http 1.3.4 (#… #42977

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 13, 2024

Conversation

potiuk
Copy link
Member

@potiuk potiuk commented Oct 13, 2024

…42954)

  • restrict looker version 24.18.0

  • update microsoft provider deps with microsoft-kiota-http

  • update gh issue ids to provider yaml files

  • ignore type in applfowhook

  • ignore type in applfowhook

  • ignore type in applfowhook

(cherry picked from commit 7d8ea68)


^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.

@potiuk
Copy link
Member Author

potiuk commented Oct 13, 2024

Backport of #42954 in order to make v2-10-test build without errors.

@gopidesupavan
Copy link
Member

Backport of #42954 in order to make v2-10-test build without errors.

ah sorry my bad..

@gopidesupavan
Copy link
Member

@potiuk should we back port the recent prs related flaky and some k8s test updates?

@potiuk
Copy link
Member Author

potiuk commented Oct 13, 2024

@potiuk should we back port the recent prs related flaky and some k8s test updates?

Yes. Might be a good idea.

…pache#42954)

* restrict looker version 24.18.0

* update microsoft provider deps with microsoft-kiota-http

* update gh issue ids to provider yaml files

* ignore type in applfowhook

* ignore type in applfowhook

* ignore type in applfowhook

(cherry picked from commit 7d8ea68)
@potiuk
Copy link
Member Author

potiuk commented Oct 13, 2024

Yes. Might be a good idea.

That is a VERY good idea - I see a huge difference in the stability now main vs. 2-10-test after all the fixes you and others came up with for the stability!

@gopidesupavan
Copy link
Member

Yes. Might be a good idea.

That is a VERY good idea - I see a huge difference in the stability now main vs. 2-10-test after all the fixes you and others came up with for the stability!

Sure will create those prs :)

@potiuk potiuk merged commit 658d97d into apache:v2-10-test Oct 13, 2024
99 checks passed
@potiuk potiuk deleted the restrict-looker branch October 13, 2024 21:12
utkarsharma2 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2024
…42954) (#42977)

* restrict looker version 24.18.0

* update microsoft provider deps with microsoft-kiota-http

* update gh issue ids to provider yaml files

* ignore type in applfowhook

* ignore type in applfowhook

* ignore type in applfowhook

(cherry picked from commit 7d8ea68)

Co-authored-by: GPK <[email protected]>
utkarsharma2 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2024
…42954) (#42977)

* restrict looker version 24.18.0

* update microsoft provider deps with microsoft-kiota-http

* update gh issue ids to provider yaml files

* ignore type in applfowhook

* ignore type in applfowhook

* ignore type in applfowhook

(cherry picked from commit 7d8ea68)

Co-authored-by: GPK <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants