Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat(arbiter-derive): create #[derive(Deploy)] #507

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Sep 18, 2023

Conversation

Autoparallel
Copy link
Collaborator

Give an overview of the tasks completed
Created a new crate called arbiter-derive which is set to be proc_macro = true. Added a single proc macro for #[derive(Deploy)] that should assist end users in having an slightly easier contract deploy process.

Link to issue(s) that this PR closes
N/A

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 18, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #507 (de7a71f) into main (868e4c5) will increase coverage by 0.33%.
Report is 7 commits behind head on main.
The diff coverage is 81.48%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #507      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   58.35%   58.68%   +0.33%     
==========================================
  Files          10       11       +1     
  Lines        3664     3718      +54     
==========================================
+ Hits         2138     2182      +44     
- Misses       1526     1536      +10     
Files Changed Coverage Δ
arbiter-derive/src/lib.rs 81.48% <81.48%> (ø)

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

Copy link
Collaborator

@0xJepsen 0xJepsen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm!

@0xJepsen 0xJepsen merged commit b8d973e into main Sep 18, 2023
@Autoparallel Autoparallel deleted the feat(arbiter-derive)-create-deploy-derive branch September 19, 2023 13:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants