ci: use PyAnsys doc formattor and code-style checker. #3380
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
prmukherj
commented
Oct 10, 2024
prmukherj
requested review from
mkundu1,
seanpearsonuk and
hpohekar
as code owners
seanpearsonuk
approved these changes
Oct 10, 2024
hpohekar
approved these changes
Oct 10, 2024
mkundu1
approved these changes
Oct 10, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PyAnsys code-style checker has been introduced in place of a custom one.
Later we can shift to PyAnsys checkers to reduce manual effort in maintaining (for doc-style checking as well).