Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Liveness protection for testnet #981

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

brentstone
Copy link
Collaborator

Currently based on v0.12.2

In the absence of rewards in the current testnet, we would like to ensure liveness by providing a mechanism for fully unbonding validators who go offline for extended periods of time.

@juped juped added this to the 0.14 milestone Jan 10, 2023
@tzemanovic tzemanovic marked this pull request as draft January 10, 2023 11:08
@brentstone brentstone force-pushed the brent/liveness-protection-unbonding branch from 8a7420f to f26ecef Compare January 13, 2023 23:32
@tzemanovic tzemanovic modified the milestones: 0.14, 0.15 Feb 8, 2023
@cwgoes
Copy link
Collaborator

cwgoes commented May 10, 2023

Is this still relevant?

@brentstone
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Is this still relevant?

I'm not sure actually, do you think we will still want some feature like this? Even for mainnet?

@cwgoes
Copy link
Collaborator

cwgoes commented May 11, 2023

I don't think we need to unbond them, but perhaps if a validator doesn't vote in some number of blocks we should jail them (so they aren't voting)?

@brentstone
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I don't think we need to unbond them, but perhaps if a validator doesn't vote in some number of blocks we should jail them (so they aren't voting)?

I'm in favor of this, so let's keep this open. I'd like to come back to it once we're good with slashing, redelegation, etc if that is fine.

@adrianbrink
Copy link
Member

I don't think we need to unbond them, but perhaps if a validator doesn't vote in some number of blocks we should jail them (so they aren't voting)?

I'm in favor of this, so let's keep this open. I'd like to come back to it once we're good with slashing, redelegation, etc if that is fine.

I'll close this for now. This still needs to be done and here is the corresponding issue: #1360

@brentstone brentstone deleted the brent/liveness-protection-unbonding branch December 28, 2023 00:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants