Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Inconsistent parameters in genesis toml files #1048

Closed
Tracked by #2004
mariari opened this issue Jan 18, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #2088
Closed
Tracked by #2004

Inconsistent parameters in genesis toml files #1048

mariari opened this issue Jan 18, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #2088
Assignees

Comments

@mariari
Copy link
Member

mariari commented Jan 18, 2023

Currently all end to end tests pass, however there is a configuration error with the: e2e-tests-single-node.toml, in that the Dot token is incorrectly setup

[token.DOT]
address = "atest1v4ehgw36gg6nvs2zgfpyxsfjgc65yv6pxy6nwwfsxgungdzrggeyzv35gveyxsjyxymyz335hur2jn"
vp = "vp_token"
[token.Dot.balances]
Albert = 1000000
Bertha = 1000000
Christel = 1000000
Daewon = 1000000
faucet = 9223372036854

causing two tokens Dot and DOT to be created

mariari added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 18, 2023
This addresses #1048 that creates two different dot toekns, along with
fixing dev's parameters to be consistent with dev's toml file and not
the e2e toml file
mariari added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 9, 2023
This addresses #1048 that creates two different dot toekns, along with
fixing dev's parameters to be consistent with dev's toml file and not
the e2e toml file
mariari added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 9, 2023
This addresses #1048 that creates two different dot toekns, along with
fixing dev's parameters to be consistent with dev's toml file and not
the e2e toml file
mariari added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 9, 2023
This addresses #1048 that creates two different dot toekns, along with
fixing dev's parameters to be consistent with dev's toml file and not
the e2e toml file
mariari added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 22, 2023
This addresses #1048 that creates two different dot toekns, along with
fixing dev's parameters to be consistent with dev's toml file and not
the e2e toml file
mariari added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 22, 2023
This addresses #1048 that creates two different dot toekns, along with
fixing dev's parameters to be consistent with dev's toml file and not
the e2e toml file
mariari added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 22, 2023
This addresses #1048 that creates two different dot toekns, along with
fixing dev's parameters to be consistent with dev's toml file and not
the e2e toml file
mariari added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 22, 2023
This addresses #1048 that creates two different dot toekns, along with
fixing dev's parameters to be consistent with dev's toml file and not
the e2e toml file
mariari added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 24, 2023
This addresses #1048 that creates two different dot toekns, along with
fixing dev's parameters to be consistent with dev's toml file and not
the e2e toml file
tzemanovic pushed a commit that referenced this issue Apr 14, 2023
This addresses #1048 that creates two different dot toekns, along with
fixing dev's parameters to be consistent with dev's toml file and not
the e2e toml file
mariari added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 5, 2023
This addresses #1048 that creates two different dot toekns, along with
fixing dev's parameters to be consistent with dev's toml file and not
the e2e toml file
mariari added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 5, 2023
This addresses #1048 that creates two different dot toekns, along with
fixing dev's parameters to be consistent with dev's toml file and not
the e2e toml file
mariari added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 5, 2023
This addresses #1048 that creates two different dot toekns, along with
fixing dev's parameters to be consistent with dev's toml file and not
the e2e toml file
@batconjurer batconjurer mentioned this issue Nov 3, 2023
2 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant