Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Remove abstract #2219

Merged
merged 42 commits into from
Jun 30, 2023
Merged

Remove abstract #2219

merged 42 commits into from
Jun 30, 2023

Conversation

janmasrovira
Copy link
Collaborator

@janmasrovira janmasrovira commented Jun 20, 2023 •
edited
Loading

@janmasrovira janmasrovira added this to the 0.4.1 milestone Jun 20, 2023
@janmasrovira janmasrovira self-assigned this Jun 20, 2023
@janmasrovira janmasrovira linked an issue Jun 20, 2023 that may be closed by this pull request
Remove Abstract #2002
Closed
@janmasrovira janmasrovira force-pushed the 2002-remove-abstract branch 8 times, most recently from 094c4a9 to e49a6c3 Compare June 23, 2023 10:12
@paulcadman paulcadman modified the milestones: 0.4.1, 0.4.2 Jun 23, 2023
@janmasrovira janmasrovira force-pushed the 2002-remove-abstract branch 9 times, most recently from 8bd82dc to 7161b64 Compare June 29, 2023 11:12
@janmasrovira janmasrovira marked this pull request as ready for review June 29, 2023 12:31
@janmasrovira janmasrovira requested a review from lukaszcz June 29, 2023 12:51
@janmasrovira janmasrovira mentioned this pull request Jun 29, 2023
Closed
@lukaszcz lukaszcz force-pushed the 2002-remove-abstract branch from 40c2c77 to afabbe4 Compare June 29, 2023 15:25
@janmasrovira janmasrovira mentioned this pull request Jun 30, 2023
Merged
@lukaszcz lukaszcz merged commit d69d8c6 into main Jun 30, 2023
@lukaszcz lukaszcz deleted the 2002-remove-abstract branch June 30, 2023 13:01
lukaszcz pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 3, 2023
@janmasrovira
Add syntax for builtin list (#2239)
0cc689a 
- Depends on #2219 
- Closes #1643 

This pr introduces a `list` as a new builtin so that we can use syntax
sugar both in expressions and patterns. E.g. it is now possible to write
`[1; 2; 3;]`.
@paulcadman paulcadman mentioned this pull request Jul 10, 2023
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@lukaszcz lukaszcz lukaszcz approved these changes

Assignees

@janmasrovira janmasrovira

Labels
refactor
Projects
None yet
Milestone
0.4.2
3 participants
@janmasrovira @lukaszcz @paulcadman