Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
cls_u32: fix use after free in u32_destroy_key()
Li Shuang reported an Oops with cls_u32 due to an use-after-free in u32_destroy_key(). The use-after-free can be triggered with: dev=lo tc qdisc add dev $dev root handle 1: htb default 10 tc filter add dev $dev parent 1: prio 5 handle 1: protocol ip u32 divisor 256 tc filter add dev $dev protocol ip parent 1: prio 5 u32 ht 800:: match ip dst\ 10.0.0.0/8 hashkey mask 0x0000ff00 at 16 link 1: tc qdisc del dev $dev root Which causes the following kasan splat: ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in u32_destroy_key.constprop.21+0x117/0x140 [cls_u32] Read of size 4 at addr ffff881b83dae618 by task kworker/u48:5/571 CPU: 17 PID: 571 Comm: kworker/u48:5 Not tainted 4.15.0+ #87 Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R730/072T6D, BIOS 2.1.7 06/16/2016 Workqueue: tc_filter_workqueue u32_delete_key_freepf_work [cls_u32] Call Trace: dump_stack+0xd6/0x182 ? dma_virt_map_sg+0x22e/0x22e print_address_description+0x73/0x290 kasan_report+0x277/0x360 ? u32_destroy_key.constprop.21+0x117/0x140 [cls_u32] u32_destroy_key.constprop.21+0x117/0x140 [cls_u32] u32_delete_key_freepf_work+0x1c/0x30 [cls_u32] process_one_work+0xae0/0x1c80 ? sched_clock+0x5/0x10 ? pwq_dec_nr_in_flight+0x3c0/0x3c0 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x29/0x40 ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x381/0x570 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x29/0x40 ? finish_task_switch+0x1e5/0x760 ? finish_task_switch+0x208/0x760 ? preempt_notifier_dec+0x20/0x20 ? __schedule+0x839/0x1ee0 ? check_noncircular+0x20/0x20 ? firmware_map_remove+0x73/0x73 ? find_held_lock+0x39/0x1c0 ? worker_thread+0x434/0x1820 ? lock_contended+0xee0/0xee0 ? lock_release+0x1100/0x1100 ? init_rescuer.part.16+0x150/0x150 ? retint_kernel+0x10/0x10 worker_thread+0x216/0x1820 ? process_one_work+0x1c80/0x1c80 ? lock_acquire+0x1a5/0x540 ? lock_downgrade+0x6b0/0x6b0 ? sched_clock+0x5/0x10 ? lock_release+0x1100/0x1100 ? compat_start_thread+0x80/0x80 ? do_raw_spin_trylock+0x190/0x190 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x29/0x40 ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x381/0x570 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x29/0x40 ? finish_task_switch+0x1e5/0x760 ? finish_task_switch+0x208/0x760 ? preempt_notifier_dec+0x20/0x20 ? __schedule+0x839/0x1ee0 ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x143/0x320 ? firmware_map_remove+0x73/0x73 ? sched_clock+0x5/0x10 ? sched_clock_cpu+0x18/0x170 ? find_held_lock+0x39/0x1c0 ? schedule+0xf3/0x3b0 ? lock_downgrade+0x6b0/0x6b0 ? __schedule+0x1ee0/0x1ee0 ? do_wait_intr_irq+0x340/0x340 ? do_raw_spin_trylock+0x190/0x190 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x32/0x60 ? process_one_work+0x1c80/0x1c80 ? process_one_work+0x1c80/0x1c80 kthread+0x312/0x3d0 ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0xc0/0xc0 ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 Allocated by task 1688: kasan_kmalloc+0xa0/0xd0 __kmalloc+0x162/0x380 u32_change+0x1220/0x3c9e [cls_u32] tc_ctl_tfilter+0x1ba6/0x2f80 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x4f0/0x9d0 netlink_rcv_skb+0x124/0x320 netlink_unicast+0x430/0x600 netlink_sendmsg+0x8fa/0xd60 sock_sendmsg+0xb1/0xe0 ___sys_sendmsg+0x678/0x980 __sys_sendmsg+0xc4/0x210 do_syscall_64+0x232/0x7f0 return_from_SYSCALL_64+0x0/0x75 Freed by task 112: kasan_slab_free+0x71/0xc0 kfree+0x114/0x320 rcu_process_callbacks+0xc3f/0x1600 __do_softirq+0x2bf/0xc06 The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff881b83dae600 which belongs to the cache kmalloc-4096 of size 4096 The buggy address is located 24 bytes inside of 4096-byte region [ffff881b83dae600, ffff881b83daf600) The buggy address belongs to the page: page:ffffea006e0f6a00 count:1 mapcount:0 mapping: (null) index:0x0 compound_mapcount: 0 flags: 0x17ffffc0008100(slab|head) raw: 0017ffffc0008100 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000100070007 raw: dead000000000100 dead000000000200 ffff880187c0e600 0000000000000000 page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected Memory state around the buggy address: ffff881b83dae500: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc ffff881b83dae580: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc >ffff881b83dae600: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb ^ ffff881b83dae680: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb ffff881b83dae700: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb ================================================================== The problem is that the htnode is freed before the linked knodes and the latter will try to access the first at u32_destroy_key() time. This change addresses the issue using the htnode refcnt to guarantee the correct free order. While at it also add a RCU annotation, to keep sparse happy. v1 -> v2: use rtnl_derefence() instead of RCU read locks v2 -> v3: - don't check refcnt in u32_destroy_hnode() - cleaned-up u32_destroy() implementation - cleaned-up code comment v3 -> v4: - dropped unneeded comment Reported-by: Li Shuang <[email protected]> Fixes: c0d378e ("net_sched: use tcf_queue_work() in u32 filter") Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]> Acked-by: Cong Wang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
- Loading branch information