This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 12, 2024. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27.5k
fix(jqLite): Support unbinding event handler self within handler #5109
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we actually need to call the event handlers in ascending order? If not then we could simply do:
Then if an even removes itself from the list, it won't affect the iteration...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is no mechanism to prevent handlers from removing other event handlers (or all event handlers). When iterating in any order on the current
eventHandlers
array, it causes another event handler to be skipped or fired twice, or even throw an error.Perhaps, I should rename this commit to make this clearer that this prevents errors or unwanted behavior that arise from modifications to the eventHandlers array during execution of the event handlers. It also maintains consistency with jQuery's behavior of
on
,off
andtriggerHandlers
.Example:
eventHandlers = [hdl1, hdl2, hdl3]
hdl3
removeshdl2
Execution:
i = 2, eventHandlers = [hdl1, hdl2, hdl3]
,hdl3
is called. Then,hdl2
is removed.i = 1, eventHandlers = [hdl1, hdl3]
,hdl3
is called.i = 0, eventHandlers = [hdl1, hdl3]
,hdl1
is called.hdl3
is called twice.hdl2
doesn't get called on this event at all. While this maybe intended forhdl2
, I don't think users should be relying on such behavior. That's perhaps why jQuery is duplicating the array first as well (https://github.com/jquery/jquery/blob/master/src/event.js).