Missing fields in FixVersion struct

[urld]

Is there any reason the fields of the struct representing a fixVersion of an issue, do not match the fields of the struct representing a projects version?

// FixVersion represents a software release in which an issue is fixed.
type FixVersion struct {
	Archived        *bool  `json:"archived,omitempty" structs:"archived,omitempty"`
	ID              string `json:"id,omitempty" structs:"id,omitempty"`
	Name            string `json:"name,omitempty" structs:"name,omitempty"`
	ProjectID       int    `json:"projectId,omitempty" structs:"projectId,omitempty"`
	ReleaseDate     string `json:"releaseDate,omitempty" structs:"releaseDate,omitempty"`
	Released        *bool  `json:"released,omitempty" structs:"released,omitempty"`
	Self            string `json:"self,omitempty" structs:"self,omitempty"`
	UserReleaseDate string `json:"userReleaseDate,omitempty" structs:"userReleaseDate,omitempty"`
}

// Version represents a single release version of a project
type Version struct {
	Self            string `json:"self,omitempty" structs:"self,omitempty"`
	ID              string `json:"id,omitempty" structs:"id,omitempty"`
	Name            string `json:"name,omitempty" structs:"name,omitempty"`
	Description     string `json:"description,omitempty" structs:"name,omitempty"`
	Archived        bool   `json:"archived,omitempty" structs:"archived,omitempty"`
	Released        bool   `json:"released,omitempty" structs:"released,omitempty"`
	ReleaseDate     string `json:"releaseDate,omitempty" structs:"releaseDate,omitempty"`
	UserReleaseDate string `json:"userReleaseDate,omitempty" structs:"userReleaseDate,omitempty"`
	ProjectID       int    `json:"projectId,omitempty" structs:"projectId,omitempty"` // Unlike other IDs, this is returned as a number
	StartDate       string `json:"startDate,omitempty" structs:"startDate,omitempty"`
}

I can live with the bool pointer weirdness, but i'd really like to access the versions description directly from the issue.
If this is just an oversight, i could send a pull request adding the missing fields to .

[urld]

Pull Request #181 seems to be related to my problem, but has not seen activity in a while, and seems to break the API (which could be avoided easily).

[ghostsquad]

@urld I asked for a small change in the PR to maintain backward compatibility. It seems the PR author may have abandoned the issue, not sure. If you want to submit a backward compatible PR, I'd be happy to merge it and close the other one.