codacy: test Codacy behavior. #446
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Made the same modifications of the python-bindings branch, but on a clean branch (to see if Codacy is caching something wrong or not). Signed-off-by: Cristi Iacob <[email protected]>
cristi-iacob
force-pushed
the
codacy-test
branch
from
99629a8 to
1f2dbdf
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As explained here something strange is happening with the Codacy review. My guess is that is having something to do with their caching mechanism. I opened this PR to have a cache-free PR to see if the strange Codacy behavior persists. Also, in the previous draft PR #445 the commit was the same and Codacy wasn't really analyzing it.
Signed-off-by: Cristi Iacob [email protected]