-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 318
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Reproducible Builds #591
Comments
Anyway for us to test this? |
make two builds - make sure they are identical ? |
@dNechita can you apply the patch from here: and test reproducibility? |
Yes, I will test. |
I've tested with the changes in the patch |
The idea is to add the changes in the patch to libiio, right? |
I think it is just : but you need their permission first. The DCO is per author, and we won't accept anything without a signed-off-by by the original author. -Robin |
Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort [0] we noticed that libiio could not be built reproducibly. This is because it uses the current build time in the generated manpages. Patch attached that uses SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH [1]. [0] https://reproducible-builds.org/ [1] https://reproducible-builds.org/docs/source-date-epoch/
Added PR. 👍 |
Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort [0] we noticed that libiio could not be built reproducibly. This is because it uses the current build time in the generated manpages. Patch attached that uses SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH [1]. [0] https://reproducible-builds.org/ [1] https://reproducible-builds.org/docs/source-date-epoch/ Signed-off-by: Chris Lamb <[email protected]>
Thanks for the PR |
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=970498
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: