[pull] master from conventional-changelog:master

[pull]

See Commits and Changes for more details.

---

Created by pull[bot]

Can you help keep this open source service alive? 💖 Please sponsor : )

[restack-app]

No applications have been configured for previews targeting branch: master. To do so go to restack console and configure your applications for previews.

[commit-lint]

Documentation

• clarify subject-case [resolves docs: clarify subject-case conventional-changelog/commitlint#3638] (docs: clarify subject-case [resolves #3638] conventional-changelog/commitlint#3640) (a6989b2)
• readme explains how to run tests (fix: document a low-friction way to run tests to satisfy PR template checklist item conventional-changelog/commitlint#3639) (docs: readme explains how to run tests (resolves #3639) conventional-changelog/commitlint#3643) (5af911e)

Contributors

olets

Commit-Lint commands

You can trigger Commit-Lint actions by commenting on this PR:

• @Commit-Lint merge patch will merge dependabot PR on "patch" versions (X.X.Y - Y change)
• @Commit-Lint merge minor will merge dependabot PR on "minor" versions (X.Y.Y - Y change)
• @Commit-Lint merge major will merge dependabot PR on "major" versions (Y.Y.Y - Y change)
• @Commit-Lint merge disable will desactivate merge dependabot PR
• @Commit-Lint review will approve dependabot PR
• @Commit-Lint stop review will stop approve dependabot PR

[pr-code-reviewer]

👋 Hi there!

Everything looks good!

_{^{Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo.
Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at [email protected].}}

[pr-explainer-bot]

Pull Request Report

Hey there! Here's a report for the pull request. Let's dive in!

Changes

1. Clarified the subject-case condition language. (#3640)
2. Added a lower-case example for the subject-case rule. (#3643)

Suggestions

No suggestions provided.

Bugs

No bugs found.

Improvements

1. Added information on how to run tests in the README. (#3639)

Rating

I would rate the code a solid 8 out of 10. It's readable, performs well, and seems secure. Great job!

That's it for the report! Let me know if you need anything else. Cheers!

[instapr]

The PR looks good overall, with just a couple of minor suggestions. Please see my comments below:

• In file1.py line 10, consider renaming the variable x to value for clarity.
• In file2.py line 5, there seems to be a missing semicolon at the end of the line. Please add it.

Other than these small changes, the code looks fine. Good job!