Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

change: nobraket branch #29

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Aug 28, 2024
Merged

change: nobraket branch #29

merged 12 commits into from
Aug 28, 2024

Conversation

kshyatt-aws
Copy link
Member

Issue #, if available: N/A

Description of changes: Update for new removed Braket.jl branch. Stripped out JAQCD logic.

Testing done: tox passed locally.

Merge Checklist

Put an x in the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR. If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! This is simply a reminder of what we are going to look for before merging your pull request.

General

Tests

  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works (if appropriate)
  • I have checked that my tests are not configured for a specific region or account (if appropriate)

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

@kshyatt-aws kshyatt-aws requested a review from a team as a code owner August 9, 2024 15:39
src/braket/juliapkg.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@kshyatt-aws kshyatt-aws requested a review from rmshaffer August 19, 2024 14:29
rmshaffer
rmshaffer previously approved these changes Aug 19, 2024
rmshaffer
rmshaffer previously approved these changes Aug 21, 2024
pyproject.toml Outdated
Comment on lines 43 to 44
"qiskit==1.1.2",
"qiskit-braket-provider==0.4.1",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it worth making these >= instead of ==, so that we might more quickly catch regressions in new versions? Otherwise we'll have to remember to come update this.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually we should probably loosen them because this won't work with the NBIs (which are on older Qiskit) as is

@kshyatt-aws
Copy link
Member Author

Currently hunting down a performance issue related to the long time it takes to get a thread lock with ProcessPoolExecutor. We should also have run_jaqcd as a no-op here issuing a useful warning to use amazon-braket-default-simulator.

* update tests

* add a test optimization

* refactor pyproject file to have test dependencies in their own file

* Update requirements-test.txt

* Update requirements-test.txt

---------

Co-authored-by: Coull <[email protected]>
rmshaffer
rmshaffer previously approved these changes Aug 26, 2024
* change: Use multiprocessing Pool rather than ProcessPoolExecutor

* fix: No sigterm screaming

* fix: Force close and join at exit

* fix: Faster

* fix: handle julia error in serializable way

* change: Add benchmark workflow to CI

* change: Point to latest unblocking branch

* fix: linting

* fix: Don't turn off juliapkg in tox

* Update src/braket/simulator_v2/julia_workers.py

Co-authored-by: Ryan Shaffer <[email protected]>

* Update src/braket/simulator_v2/julia_workers.py

Co-authored-by: Ryan Shaffer <[email protected]>

* fix: one-line pip in benchmark

* fix: typo

* fix: Use benchmark-json option correctly

* change: Add initial output.json

* fix: Actually include benchmark script

* fix: Don't deploy benchmark results to gh-pages

* fix: restore GH token

* fix: Remove benchmarks for now

* change: Point to new BraketSimulator 0.0.4

---------

Co-authored-by: Ryan Shaffer <[email protected]>
rmshaffer
rmshaffer previously approved these changes Aug 27, 2024
@kshyatt-aws
Copy link
Member Author

Verified latest commit works on an NBI with the Qiskit example notebook

@kshyatt-aws kshyatt-aws requested a review from rmshaffer August 28, 2024 16:33
Copy link
Contributor

@rmshaffer rmshaffer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🥳

@kshyatt-aws kshyatt-aws merged commit dc99e0a into main Aug 28, 2024
13 checks passed
@kshyatt-aws kshyatt-aws deleted the ksh/nobraket branch August 28, 2024 17:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants