Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove "important board members" image constraint #9765

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 2, 2025

Conversation

ChrisBAshton
Copy link
Contributor

@ChrisBAshton ChrisBAshton commented Dec 20, 2024

Sister PRs:

This feature was added in #4162 (counterpart in Collections: alphagov/collections#754). Neither PR really explains/justifies the feature: it appears to have been added as a workaround for a specific organisation, where they'd neglected to add an image for one of their board members. Instead of adding an image for them, this feature was added to impose an artificial limit on the number of images to display on the page.

This has since caused numerous support tickets for the publishing team, with publishers struggling to understand why board member photos are missing from the org page. The limit, tucked away in the organisation settings, is not well known and is not intuitive.

We've decided to remove the feature, removing complexity from both Whitehall and Collections. It should result in fewer support tickets for the team, and be a net positive for organisations in terms of an easier-to-understand system. If we find there is a requirement to re-introduce something like this in future, we can approach it more holistically. For now, the simplest thing is to remove the feature, as we suspect it's not widely used.

Trello: https://trello.com/c/mz0WLkIR/3282-remove-display-management-team-images-feature


⚠️ This repo is Continuously Deployed: make sure you follow the guidance ⚠️

Follow these steps if you are doing a Rails upgrade.

@ChrisBAshton ChrisBAshton force-pushed the remove-important-board-member-constraint branch 2 times, most recently from 00e9ae6 to 4c0ea82 Compare December 20, 2024 14:52
This feature was added in #4162 (counterpart in Collections:
alphagov/collections#754). Neither PR
really explains/justifies the feature: it appears to have been
added as a workaround for a specific organisation, where they'd
neglected to add an image for one of their board members.
Instead of adding an image for them, this feature was added to
impose an artificial limit on the number of images to display on
the page.

This has since caused numerous support tickets for the publishing
team, with publishers struggling to understand why board member
photos are missing from the org page. The limit, tucked away in
the organisation settings, is not well known and is not intuitive.

We've decided to remove the feature, removing complexity from
both Whitehall and Collections. It should result in fewer support
tickets for the team, and be a net positive for organisations
in terms of an easier-to-understand system. If we find there is
a requirement to re-introduce something like this in future, we
can approach it more holistically. For now, the simplest thing is
to remove the feature, as we suspect it's not widely used.

Trello: https://trello.com/c/mz0WLkIR/3282-remove-display-management-team-images-feature
@ChrisBAshton ChrisBAshton force-pushed the remove-important-board-member-constraint branch from 4c0ea82 to 8004d85 Compare December 20, 2024 15:02
The 'important_board_members' dependency was removed in the
previous commit.
Copy link
Contributor

@ryanb-gds ryanb-gds left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good to see this gone, most peculiar feature

@ChrisBAshton ChrisBAshton merged commit 6c8a325 into main Jan 2, 2025
19 checks passed
@ChrisBAshton ChrisBAshton deleted the remove-important-board-member-constraint branch January 2, 2025 10:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants