Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ISSUE #2858] Unified http client implementation, enhanced async request callback interface #3452

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jul 27, 2020
Merged

[ISSUE #2858] Unified http client implementation, enhanced async request callback interface #3452

merged 6 commits into from
Jul 27, 2020

Conversation

Maijh97
Copy link
Collaborator

@Maijh97 Maijh97 commented Jul 26, 2020

Please do not create a Pull Request without creating an issue first.

What is the purpose of the change

#2858

Brief changelog

Add onCancel method to callback

Verifying this change

XXXX

Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:

  • Make sure there is a Github issue filed for the change (usually before you start working on it). Trivial changes like typos do not require a Github issue. Your pull request should address just this issue, without pulling in other changes - one PR resolves one issue.
  • Format the pull request title like [ISSUE #123] Fix UnknownException when host config not exist. Each commit in the pull request should have a meaningful subject line and body.
  • Write a pull request description that is detailed enough to understand what the pull request does, how, and why.
  • Write necessary unit-test to verify your logic correction, more mock a little better when cross module dependency exist. If the new feature or significant change is committed, please remember to add integration-test in test module.
  • Run mvn -B clean package apache-rat:check findbugs:findbugs -Dmaven.test.skip=true to make sure basic checks pass. Run mvn clean install -DskipITs to make sure unit-test pass. Run mvn clean test-compile failsafe:integration-test to make sure integration-test pass.

@Maijh97 Maijh97 changed the title Unified http client implementation, enhanced async request callback interface [ISSUE #2858] Unified http client implementation, enhanced async request callback interface Jul 26, 2020
@@ -454,7 +454,7 @@ protected void executeBody() {
try {
asyncHttpClient
.post(url, Header.newInstance().addParam(Constants.NACOS_SERVER_HEADER, VersionUtils.version),
Query.EMPTY, getSelf(), reference.getType(), new Callback<String>() {
Query.EMPTY, getSelf(), reference.getType(), new AbstractCallback<String>() {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why not use interface rather than Abstract class?

@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ public NacosClusterController(ServerMemberManager memberManager) {
final String url = HttpUtils
.buildUrl(false, member.getAddress(), ApplicationUtils.getContextPath(), Commons.NACOS_CORE_CONTEXT,
"/cluster/server/leave");
asyncHttpClient.post(url, Header.EMPTY, Query.EMPTY, params, genericType.getType(), new Callback<String>() {
asyncHttpClient.post(url, Header.EMPTY, Query.EMPTY, params, genericType.getType(), new AbstractCallback<String>() {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same question as above

*
* @author mai.jh
*/
public abstract class AbstractCallback<T> implements Callback<T> {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

An abstract class but without any default implement and no more abstract method?

@Maijh97 Maijh97 requested a review from KomachiSion July 27, 2020 03:55
@KomachiSion KomachiSion merged commit 5b76fd0 into alibaba:develop Jul 27, 2020
@KomachiSion KomachiSion added this to the 1.3.2 milestone Jul 27, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants