Filament admin panel

[alexjustesen]

Changelog

Added

• Filament admin panel

Default Admin Account

• Username: [email protected]
• Password: password

Previews

Authentication

Results

[alexdelprete]

Great news!

I just tested this, and I have a "mixed content" issue loading the admin panel, it doesn't load the CSS. I use Traefik, with an https url, and it's pulling the site from the internal docker http url.

This is what I see in the log (see http error 302):

10.1.10.30 - - [28/Sep/2022:17:55:07 +0200] "GET / HTTP/1.1" 302 394 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/107.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/107.0.0.0"
10.1.10.30 - - [28/Sep/2022:17:55:07 +0200] "GET /admin HTTP/1.1" 302 418 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/107.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/107.0.0.0"
10.1.10.30 - - [28/Sep/2022:17:55:07 +0200] "GET /admin/login HTTP/1.1" 200 3639 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/107.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/107.0.0.0"
10.1.10.30 - - [28/Sep/2022:17:55:22 +0200] "POST /livewire/message/filament.core.auth.login HTTP/1.1" 200 264 "https://speedtest.osilife.net/admin/login" "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko)Chrome/107.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/107.0.0.0"
10.1.10.30 - - [28/Sep/2022:17:55:23 +0200] "GET /admin HTTP/1.1" 200 13616 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/107.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/107.0.0.0"

If I use the docker url directly it works fine.

This is the log whith the direct url, bypassing the proxy:

10.1.10.45 - - [28/Sep/2022:17:42:31 +0200] "POST /livewire/message/filament.core.auth.login HTTP/1.1" 200 257 "http://docker2.axel.dom:8008/admin/login" "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/107.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/107.0.0.0"
10.1.10.45 - - [28/Sep/2022:17:42:31 +0200] "GET /admin HTTP/1.1" 200 13623 "http://docker2.axel.dom:8008/admin/login" "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/107.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/107.0.0.0"
10.1.10.45 - - [28/Sep/2022:17:42:38 +0200] "GET /admin HTTP/1.1" 200 13620 "http://docker2.axel.dom:8008/admin" "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/107.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/107.0.0.0"
10.1.10.45 - - [28/Sep/2022:17:42:45 +0200] "GET /admin/results HTTP/1.1" 200 19249 "http://docker2.axel.dom:8008/admin" "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/107.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/107.0.0.0"

I already had this issue with BookStack, that is built with PHP: BookStackApp/BookStack#1204

The guys at LinuxServer.io built the BookStack image with an APP_URL env variable to solve the issue with reverse proxies. I guess it configures the BASE_URL for php, something like that.

[alexdelprete]

BTW: I noticed really low speed values, I just did a manual test with the server 4302 I configured in config.yml:

speedtest:
  enabled: true
  schedule: '*/40 * * * *' # every hour
  ookla_server_id: 4302 # specify a server ID to use a sepecific server
tz: 'Europe/Rome'

   Speedtest by Ookla

      Server: Vodafone IT - Milan (id: 4302)
         ISP: Tecno General S.r.l
Idle Latency:     8.64 ms   (jitter: 0.31ms, low: 8.36ms, high: 9.29ms)
    Download:   813.10 Mbps (data used: 874.1 MB)
                 42.38 ms   (jitter: 38.70ms, low: 9.66ms, high: 941.40ms)
      Upload:   261.07 Mbps (data used: 150.7 MB)
                  9.76 ms   (jitter: 0.77ms, low: 8.44ms, high: 12.24ms)
 Packet Loss:     0.0%
  Result URL: https://www.speedtest.net/result/c/158c6f1d-3278-4606-b24a-fbd142c6deec

Is alpha.6 still using config.yml? If that's the case, I'm worried about the performance within docker, but the old speedtest-tracker worked fine in that regard. How do I check detailed info of a single test (server used, etc.)?

[alexjustesen]

@alexdelprete do you mind opening separate issues for the two comments above? This way I don't lose them in a closed PR?

[alexdelprete]

Sorry about that, sometimes I feel like I'm in the discussions section. :)

I will open the 2 PRs.