Use web workers with react hook
https://useworker.js.org/
- Run expensive function without blocking UI (Show live gif)
- Supports Promises pattern instead of event-messages
- Size: less than
3KB
! - Clear API using hook
- Typescript support
- Garbage collector web worker instance
- Remote dependencies option
- timeout option
💾 Install
- @latest
npm install --save @koale/useworker
import { useWorker, WORKER_STATUS } from "@koale/useworker";
- Sorting: Sorting 50000 random numbers
- Csv: Generate Csv, Parse Csv, Convert to JSON
- External Dependencies Use external scripts inside WebWorker
Before you start using this hook, I suggest you to read the Web Worker documentation.
import React from "react";
import { useWorker } from "@koale/useworker";
const numbers = [...Array(5000000)].map((e) => ~~(Math.random() * 1000000));
const sortNumbers = (nums) => nums.sort();
const Example = () => {
const [sortWorker] = useWorker(sortNumbers);
const runSort = async () => {
const result = await sortWorker(numbers); // non-blocking UI
console.log(result);
};
return (
<button type="button" onClick={runSort}>
Run Sort
</button>
);
};
More examples: https://github.com/alewin/useWorker/tree/develop/example
- Kill Web Worker
- Reactive web worker status
- Add timeout option
- Import and use remote script inside
useWorker
function - support Transferable Objects
- Testing useWorker #41
- Import and use local script inside
useWorker
function #37 - useWorkers Hook #38
- useWorkerFile Hook #93
Most react projects are initialized through Create React App. CRA unfortunately does not offer support for webworkers, unless you eject and change the webpack configuration manually.
This library allows you to use web workers without having to change the CRA configuration, which is why there are often limitations or particular workarounds.
If you are interested in changing the webpack configuration to manually manage your workers, see: worker-loader
There's a known issue related to transpiling tools such as Babel causing Not refereced
errors.
Since the approach of this library is moving the entire function passed to the Hook to a worker, if the function gets transpiled, variable definitions used by the transpiling tool may get out of scope when the function gets moved to the worker, causing unexpected reference errors.
If you're experimenting this type of issue, one workaround is wrapping your function declaration inside a function object as a string.
const sum = new Function(`a`, `b`, `return a + b`);
The library is experimental so if you find a bug or would like to request a new feature, open an issue
- Thanks to:
- @zant (test, CI,
RFC
, bugfixes,localdependencies
feature, ...) - @101arrowz (
isoworker
packages proposal ) - @z4o4z (
Typescript
implementation, Discussion ofRFC
) - @IljaDaderko (
Typescript
support, Discussion ofRFC
) - @ophirg (
Typescript
support) - @Pigotz (Discussion of
RFC
) - @gubo97000 (Fix #108)
How to contribute?
Read CONTRIBUTE.md