Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Procedures missing for airports #735

Closed
albar965 opened this issue Jul 13, 2021 · 8 comments
Closed

Procedures missing for airports #735

albar965 opened this issue Jul 13, 2021 · 8 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@albar965
Copy link
Owner

MSFS 1.18.9 introduced (again) new record types for procedures and procedure legs.

@albar965 albar965 added the MSFS label Jul 13, 2021
@albar965 albar965 added this to the Release 2.6.15 milestone Jul 13, 2021
@albar965 albar965 self-assigned this Jul 13, 2021
@albar965
Copy link
Owner Author

@icykoneko If you have any information on this. Otherwise I'll dig into the new records.

@icykoneko
Copy link

I haven’t run it since update. I may get a chance to look at it tomorrow though. Why must they mess everything up so much.

@albar965
Copy link
Owner Author

There are new records for procedure legs:

  • Approach: 0xf4 (leg) and 0xf5 (most likely missed leg)
  • Transition: 0xf6 (leg)
  • SidStar: 0xf8 (unknown leg)

Why must they mess everything up so much.

You can say that again! We've got better things to do. And I'd rather fix bugs and add new features to LNM. 🙁

@icykoneko
Copy link

icykoneko commented Jul 14, 2021 via email

@albar965
Copy link
Owner Author

I'm looking at classes Approach and Transition now.

@albar965
Copy link
Owner Author

The new approach and transition records have 4 bytes extra at the end of the structure. No idea about the content.

@albar965
Copy link
Owner Author

I also looked at the SidStar. Same change but the new record is for common route and there are new leg records.

albar965 added a commit to albar965/atools that referenced this issue Jul 14, 2021
@albar965
Copy link
Owner Author

Looks ok so far. Can deal with 1.18 and also with the current 1.17. Change is in master.

Development build right here:
https://www.magentacloud.de/lnk/hfrAAvmF

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants