Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use flyweight fields instead of class fields for control #1030

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 16, 2024
Merged

Use flyweight fields instead of class fields for control #1030

merged 2 commits into from
May 16, 2024

Conversation

akrambek
Copy link
Contributor

@akrambek akrambek commented May 15, 2024

Description

Use flyweight fields instead of class fields for control.

Fixes #1004

Comment on lines 382 to 384
long replySeq,
long replyAck,
int replyMax,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These parameters should not be directional, i.e. sequence, not replySeq, etc.

@jfallows jfallows merged commit 34d7051 into aklivity:develop May 16, 2024
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Flow control issue in openapi binding
2 participants