Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve performance of calculating the URL hash #1318

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 18, 2024
Merged

Improve performance of calculating the URL hash #1318

merged 3 commits into from
Oct 18, 2024

Conversation

bdraco
Copy link
Member

@bdraco bdraco commented Oct 17, 2024

Avoid calling SplitResult._replace since its much slower, and instead replace with fast NamedTuple creation tuple.__new__(Type, (...)

Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Oct 18, 2024

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #1318 will improve performances by ×2.2

Comparing hash_pref (b7ca114) with master (6601ba5)

Summary

⚡ 1 improvements
✅ 78 untouched benchmarks

Benchmarks breakdown

Benchmark master hash_pref Change
test_url_hash 700.3 µs 324.9 µs ×2.2

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 18, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.96%. Comparing base (6601ba5) to head (b7ca114).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1318   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.96%   95.96%           
=======================================
  Files          27       27           
  Lines        5401     5401           
  Branches      329      329           
=======================================
  Hits         5183     5183           
  Misses        192      192           
  Partials       26       26           
Flag Coverage Δ
CI-GHA 95.96% <100.00%> (ø)
MyPy 44.61% <75.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
OS-Linux 99.31% <100.00%> (ø)
OS-Windows 99.37% <100.00%> (ø)
OS-macOS 99.04% <100.00%> (ø)
Py-3.10.11 99.02% <100.00%> (ø)
Py-3.10.15 99.27% <100.00%> (ø)
Py-3.11.10 99.27% <100.00%> (ø)
Py-3.11.9 99.02% <100.00%> (ø)
Py-3.12.7 99.27% <100.00%> (ø)
Py-3.13.0 99.27% <100.00%> (ø)
Py-3.9.13 98.97% <100.00%> (ø)
Py-3.9.20 99.22% <100.00%> (ø)
Py-pypy7.3.16 99.27% <100.00%> (ø)
Py-pypy7.3.17 99.30% <100.00%> (ø)
VM-macos-latest 99.04% <100.00%> (ø)
VM-ubuntu-latest 99.31% <100.00%> (ø)
VM-windows-latest 99.37% <100.00%> (ø)
pytest 99.31% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@psf-chronographer psf-chronographer bot added the bot:chronographer:provided There is a change note present in this PR label Oct 18, 2024
@bdraco bdraco marked this pull request as ready for review October 18, 2024 01:27
@bdraco bdraco merged commit bcd9936 into master Oct 18, 2024
43 of 46 checks passed
@bdraco bdraco deleted the hash_pref branch October 18, 2024 01:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bot:chronographer:provided There is a change note present in this PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant