Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update setuptools to 30.2.0 #227

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 4, 2016

Conversation

pyup-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pyup-bot pyup-bot commented Dec 4, 2016

There's a new version of setuptools available.
You are currently using 30.0.0. I have updated it to 30.2.0

These links might come in handy: PyPI | Changelog | Repo | Docs

Changelog

30.2.0


  • 854: Bump to vendored Packaging 16.8.

30.1.0


  • 846: Also trap 'socket.error' when opening URLs in
    package_index.
  • 849: Manifest processing now matches the filename
    pattern anywhere in the filename and not just at the
    start. Restores behavior found prior to 28.5.0.

Got merge conflicts? Close this PR and delete the branch. I'll create a new PR for you.

Happy merging! 🤖

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Dec 4, 2016

Current coverage is 91.85% (diff: 100%)

Merging #227 into master will decrease coverage by 0.14%

@@             master       #227   diff @@
==========================================
  Files            12         12          
  Lines          1350       1350          
  Methods           0          0          
  Messages          0          0          
  Branches        172        172          
==========================================
- Hits           1242       1240     -2   
- Misses           79         80     +1   
- Partials         29         30     +1   

Powered by Codecov. Last update 968220e...32928ee

@asvetlov asvetlov merged commit 4ec9277 into master Dec 4, 2016
@asvetlov asvetlov deleted the pyup-update-setuptools-30.0.0-to-30.2.0 branch December 4, 2016 18:53
vir-mir pushed a commit to vir-mir/aiopg that referenced this pull request Dec 7, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants