Add benchmarks for github url resolving emulation

[asvetlov]

I think github API is a representative example for possible route table.

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #9925 will improve performances by 8.07%

_{Comparing github-benchmarks (7649f01) with master (e9637a9)}

Summary

⚡ 1 improvements
✅ 31 untouched benchmarks

🆕 2 new benchmarks

Benchmarks breakdown

	Benchmark	master	github-benchmarks	Change
⚡	test_one_thousand_large_round_trip_websocket_text_messages[pyloop]	25.3 ms	23.4 ms	+8.07%
🆕	test_resolve_gitapi[pyloop]	N/A	315.3 ms	N/A
🆕	test_resolve_gitapi_subapps[pyloop]	N/A	8.6 ms	N/A

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 98.71%. Comparing base (e9637a9) to head (7649f01).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #9925   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.71%   98.71%           
=======================================
  Files         120      120           
  Lines       36479    36540   +61     
  Branches     4342     4353   +11     
=======================================
+ Hits        36011    36072   +61     
  Misses        315      315           
  Partials      153      153           

Flag	Coverage Δ
CI-GHA	98.60% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
OS-Linux	98.29% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
OS-Windows	96.11% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
OS-macOS	97.38% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
Py-3.10.11	97.23% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
Py-3.10.15	97.78% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
Py-3.11.10	97.83% <100.00%> (+0.01%)	⬆️
Py-3.11.9	97.29% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
Py-3.12.7	98.36% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
Py-3.13.0	98.35% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
Py-3.9.13	97.15% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
Py-3.9.20	97.74% <100.00%> (+0.04%)	⬆️
Py-pypy7.3.16	97.31% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
VM-macos	97.38% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
VM-ubuntu	98.29% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
VM-windows	96.11% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[bdraco]

That websocket test flaps a bit because of memory allocation inconsistency. We might want to add it to the ignores until it can be tuned a bit more. Or simply ignore it for now since it's still a semi rare flap.

Ideally we would reduce the memcpy there instead but I don't have a good strategy for doing that

[Dreamsorcerer]

Seems like a good idea to me.

[asvetlov]

That websocket test flaps a bit because of memory allocation inconsistency. We might want to add it to the ignores until it can be tuned a bit more. Or simply ignore it for now since it's still a semi rare flap.

I'm ok to do nothing with it until a champion fixes the flappines (or implementation).

[patchback]

Backport to 3.10: 💚 backport PR created

✅ Backport PR branch: patchback/backports/3.10/69756b495d8fe0e1bf47056582d63cb6b0cb2913/pr-9925

Backported as #9926

🤖 @patchback
I'm built with octomachinery and
my source is open — https://github.com/sanitizers/patchback-github-app.

[patchback]

Backport to 3.11: 💚 backport PR created

✅ Backport PR branch: patchback/backports/3.11/69756b495d8fe0e1bf47056582d63cb6b0cb2913/pr-9925

Backported as #9927

🤖 @patchback
I'm built with octomachinery and
my source is open — https://github.com/sanitizers/patchback-github-app.

[patchback]

Backport to 3.12: 💚 backport PR created

✅ Backport PR branch: patchback/backports/3.12/69756b495d8fe0e1bf47056582d63cb6b0cb2913/pr-9925

Backported as #9928

🤖 @patchback
I'm built with octomachinery and
my source is open — https://github.com/sanitizers/patchback-github-app.