Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Release v3.9.4 #8201

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Apr 11, 2024
Merged

Release v3.9.4 #8201

merged 5 commits into from
Apr 11, 2024

Conversation

Dreamsorcerer
Copy link
Member

Preparing for tomorrow, let me know if there's any reason to delay. @bdraco @webknjaz

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 2, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.39%. Comparing base (a7e240a) to head (95eca18).
Report is 1 commits behind head on 3.9.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              3.9    #8201   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.39%   97.39%           
=======================================
  Files         108      108           
  Lines       32849    32849           
  Branches     3900     3900           
=======================================
  Hits        31994    31994           
  Misses        645      645           
  Partials      210      210           
Flag Coverage Δ
CI-GHA 97.30% <100.00%> (ø)
OS-Linux 96.98% <100.00%> (ø)
OS-Windows 94.53% <ø> (ø)
OS-macOS 96.65% <100.00%> (ø)
Py-3.10.11 94.34% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
Py-3.10.14 96.76% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
Py-3.11.9 97.02% <100.00%> (ø)
Py-3.12.2 97.07% <100.00%> (ø)
Py-3.8.10 94.32% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
Py-3.8.18 96.70% <100.00%> (ø)
Py-3.9.13 94.33% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
Py-3.9.19 96.75% <100.00%> (ø)
Py-pypy7.3.15 96.29% <100.00%> (ø)
VM-macos 96.65% <100.00%> (ø)
VM-ubuntu 96.98% <100.00%> (ø)
VM-windows 94.53% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@webknjaz webknjaz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@bdraco
Copy link
Member

bdraco commented Mar 2, 2024

#8184 might be ready tomorrow but its not a regression and its been a problem for a while so no need to wait for it

@Dreamsorcerer
Copy link
Member Author

Dreamsorcerer commented Mar 3, 2024

#8184 might be ready tomorrow but its not a regression and its been a problem for a while so no need to wait for it

Probably a good one to have in, not sure if we want to do any more 3.9 releases after this. I'll do the release later in the week if you need time to finish it.

@bdraco
Copy link
Member

bdraco commented Mar 3, 2024

I was hoping to get a thumbs up from the op on if it fixed it for his user before moving it forward. I'll write the tests for it tomorrow regardless, since I'll be time poor at the end of the week as I have family in town.

@webknjaz
Copy link
Member

I was hoping to get a thumbs up from the op on if it fixed it for his user before moving it forward.

@bdraco did you get that info?

@Dreamsorcerer
Copy link
Member Author

That one's merged now. We've had a couple of other last minute bug reports we've been fixing, but I think we're good for me to proceed with a release tomorrow.

@webknjaz
Copy link
Member

Sounds good!

@Dreamsorcerer Dreamsorcerer marked this pull request as ready for review April 11, 2024 17:53
@Dreamsorcerer Dreamsorcerer merged commit b3397c7 into 3.9 Apr 11, 2024
33 of 34 checks passed
@Dreamsorcerer Dreamsorcerer deleted the release/v3.9.4 branch April 11, 2024 17:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants