Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[3.5] Send custom per-request cookies even if session jar is empty (#3515) #3516

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 10, 2019

Conversation

asvetlov
Copy link
Member

  • Send custom per-request cookies even if session jar is empty

(cherry picked from commit a86af67)

Co-authored-by: Andrew Svetlov [email protected]

…3515)

* Send custom per-request cookies even if session jar is empty

* Add changenote
(cherry picked from commit a86af67)

Co-authored-by: Andrew Svetlov <[email protected]>
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jan 10, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #3516 into 3.5 will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              3.5    #3516   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.92%   97.92%           
=======================================
  Files          44       44           
  Lines        8565     8565           
  Branches     1382     1382           
=======================================
  Hits         8387     8387           
  Misses         72       72           
  Partials      106      106

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 4cf59e5...5d3da6c. Read the comment docs.

@asvetlov asvetlov merged commit 587da16 into 3.5 Jan 10, 2019
@asvetlov asvetlov deleted the backport-a86af67-3.5 branch January 10, 2019 13:51
@lock
Copy link

lock bot commented Jan 10, 2020

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been
any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for
related bugs.

If you feel like there's important points made in this discussion,
please include those exceprts into that new issue.

@lock lock bot added the outdated label Jan 10, 2020
@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 10, 2020
@psf-chronographer psf-chronographer bot added the bot:chronographer:provided There is a change note present in this PR label Jan 10, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
bot:chronographer:provided There is a change note present in this PR outdated
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants