Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

basics: verdi process list output unexpected? #238

Closed
ltalirz opened this issue Jun 30, 2020 · 4 comments · Fixed by #245
Closed

basics: verdi process list output unexpected? #238

ltalirz opened this issue Jun 30, 2020 · 4 comments · Fixed by #245
Assignees

Comments

@ltalirz
Copy link
Member

ltalirz commented Jun 30, 2020

The output of verdi process list -S finished is not as described here.

In particular, there are 171 results, not 6.

Furthermore, the result of verdi process list -S finished and verdi process list -a is identical (all processes have "Finished" as the process state)

@ltalirz ltalirz changed the title verdi process list output unexpected? basics: verdi process list output unexpected? Jun 30, 2020
@sphuber
Copy link
Contributor

sphuber commented Jul 1, 2020

Well it does say looks something like. We can't really show all results in the example output. And the fact that they are all finished, is just that is what the imported data happens to contain. We don't have any other states.

@mbercx
Copy link
Member

mbercx commented Jul 4, 2020

During my reworking of the basics section (PR #245), I've added ellipses ... and changed the Total results number to indicate that there are more results.

@chrisjsewell chrisjsewell linked a pull request Jul 4, 2020 that will close this issue
@ltalirz
Copy link
Member Author

ltalirz commented Jul 4, 2020

And the fact that they are all finished, is just that is what the imported data happens to contain. We don't have any other states.

Sure. I guess we all agree though that demonstrating the effect of a filter function using an example where it has no effect on the output is not ideal ;-)
I guess this comes from the fact that this is old data and there used to be different statuses, but now there no longer are due to changes to process states.

Let's keep this issue open to remind ourselves that we should include processes with different statuses in the export file.

During my reworking of the basics section (PR #245), I've added ellipses ... and changed the Total results number to indicate that there are more results.

Thanks!

@ramirezfranciscof
Copy link
Member

I understand this should have been closed already? Feel free to re-open if I'm mistaken.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants