Rename CutoffsFamily
to CutoffsPseudoPotentialFamily
#82
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The
CutoffsFamily
was introduced in order to properly test theRecommendedCutoffsMixin
. It was even given an entry point but this wasjust a requirement for the tests to work and it was never intended to
actually be used in production. However, there now seems an actual
usecase for this class as a substitute for the
SsspFamily
andPseudoDojoFamily
who also have the mixin and allow recommended cutoffsto be defined but they come with strict rules and only official sets of
pseudopotentials are supported.
If one wants to create a custom pseudopotential family but still want to
use the recommended cutoff functionality, the
PseudoPotentialFamily
base class doesn't suffice but the
CutoffsFamily
does. Now that weactually consider the class to be used for production, a more aptly
named class name is required to properly reflect its intended usage.